![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
OH... MASTER Bill, how you DO giveth and then taketh away :D :D :D (flirting with my frying pan me thinks. We'll ... "talk" ... again me thinks?) :yappy: Karmeen says nay ho ma (sleep well!) |
Quote:
Also, it's not the "Canadian Decoration"...it's the "Canadian Forces Decoration". Sunray, update your data bank!:rolleyes: :bang: |
Re: SUNRAY's Memory Lapse......
Quote:
We'll have to give the "Old Fart" a break, we have to remember that SUNRAY served when "Centurion" was a rank, not a tank, and that "VD" was a Decoration and not that other thing that sometimes appears the morning after the night before......:eek: INDIA CALL SIGN, OUT! Bye! :p |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
VD/PW :yappy: SENDS :p :D :D |
Quote:
|
NOT..... ONE...... COMMENT...... FROM...... ME...... ON....... THIS..... :bang:
|
Oh really?
JD |
Re: Re: SUNRAY's Memory Lapse......
Quote:
May I have your permission to incorporate it into my repetoire of "bon mots", when the occasion presents itself? Must have been a bummer to have had that VD post nominal, especially if one was the equivalent of a Med A, eh? |
GWB, I cannot resist:
"Keep it simple for our American friend". "Trying to explain to a newcomer, etc. etc.". Well, living in Atlanta Georgia, I guess I would probably qualify as a card carrying trailer trash red neck. Don't know from 'nothin, don't want to know from 'nothin. As we used to say in the Corps as well as in many other venues, KISS. :cheers: Bill |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not sure when the CD came in, but I'm sure one of the more august Olde Fartes here will be glad to enlighten you; I may have served when 'Centurion' was a rank rather than a tank, but THEY served during the siege of Troy. :p Quote:
Interestingly, in 1957, the female harp was judged politically incorrect (it was a woman with breasts) and replaced with the musical instrument. At the same time, the green leaves were changed to red (a portent of our socialist leanings?). Then the whole thing was done away with, sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism which acknowledges NO heritage. Ref the current flag -- consider it simply "generic". Give yer dawg a pat for me, OK? :) |
Quote:
It's interesting to see that, in one of your posts, i.e. "seems to colour our immediate reactions", that you used the "ou" instead of the "o"...Hmmm, latent Canadian perhaps? With reference to our flag (and I assume, in context you refer to the current Canadian flag), Yes, there is a message. The ends of the flag are red. Red is our Liberal (your Democrat) colour of choice. The flag, if it had to have been changed at all, most probably should have been blue on either end, to represent "from sea to shining sea". Blue is a Conservative (your Republican) colour, therefore anathema to the Liberals. However, the Liberal Federal party at the time, having a Parliamentary majority, ram-rodded this un-needed, un-wanted and generally un-warranted piece of red rag upon us. Those of us who remember, especially as 11 November draws nearer, reflect upon the fact that the Red Ensign is the symbol under which many Canadians fought and died. Lest we forget! |
Re: Jon
Ya know, I don't get a chance to one-up you too often, so I gotta take 'em when I can... :D
Actually, the U.S. party colours are reversed; red is GOP and blue is Dems. I noted this watching their election, not sure why it didn't occur to me before. |
Re: Re: Jon
Quote:
So much for the New World Order and the Brotherhood of Man (excuse me, Copeland)...if we collectively can't get it together politically, how the hell are we gonna do it at all? |
Quote:
2) - Not during the Siege of Troy...but when "J.C" was but a Lance-Corporal...........but, my mistake, I forgot that MASTER CENTURION can't remember that far back.....fell out of the chariot once to often did we MASTER CENTURION, those continuous landings on one's 'Noodle' must have had played havoc on the memory did it......:p |
Re: Re: Re: SUNRAY's Memory Lapse......
Quote:
|
Jon,
The Maple Leaf was needed and was wanted by many Canadians who thought it was more than time to be seen as no longer part of the British Empire. Whether or not the bars should be blue or red is no longer an issue after 30 years. That it is ours NOW, is. In 2004 why would we not want to be distinctive and uniquely Canadian. Our Maple Leaf is not a sop to multi-cult. It is a statement of coast to coast union, a flag that doesn't raise colonial emotions in Quebec (why is the 22e a numbered regiment and not a named one?). The Canadian Parlimentary system has not evolved since confederation to reflect the needs and changing times of Canada. A majority government will always push things through Parliment. And if the Upper House doesn't like it then the majority government of the day will stack the Upper House with more appointments so the bill will pass on 2nd reading or resubmission. So of course having a new flag pushed at us was the way it would go. In 1925 a parlimentary committee convened for 10 years to come up with an idea for a distinctively Canadian Flag and didn't. All this could have been avoided. In 1965 it was more than enough time to get on with it. HOORAY THE MAPLE LEAF!!!!! K JD |
Re: Re: Re: Re: SUNRAY's Memory Lapse......
Quote:
96 wouldn't be the 2 i/c of the Mobile Bath and Laundry Platoon would it?:confused::D If so, typical RCR.:salute: |
Quote:
En passant, why do you query the Van Doos as being a numbered regiment, without mentioning, for example, the 48th? The above notwithstanding, I disagree with your post. Ain't democracy great? Regards... :note: :salute: |
Jon,
Democracy is great. I'm glad we disagree. How's your truck running? JD |
That red rag.
A red rag?
The last person that referred to the Canadian Flag as a red rag was the Leader of the separatist Parti Quebecois. Jon you keep good company. |
Quote:
|
Re: That red rag.
Quote:
My reference was totally in apposition to that which was stated by "les autres". What is irksome to me is the political machinations which eventually resulted in the adoption of the "red rag", against the wishes of the majority of Canadians. This opinion is vis a vis the PQ's hyper reaction to the "Imperial" Red Ensign. 'Nuff said...guess we let it lie...unless the Bloc-heads keep on agitating for the Fleur de Lys...if they keep on pushing, there's gonna be a problem, big time. |
Jon,
WRT the bloc. Do like Gen McKenzie suggests. Ignore them. They are just trying to piss us off. JD |
Quote:
Take heed of the following maxim... First they ignore you... Then they laugh at you... Then they fight you... Then you win. Ghandi |
Jon,
Ack. We'll not laugh at them.. just ignore ignoramouses' ignoble emissions. (That goofball MP) :) There will always be room for, and fighting reason to retain Quebec in MY Canada. I hear the Plains of Abraham have not yet become a subdivision where (insert pipes skirling, drums beating, claymores swinging, screaming outraged oatmeal warriors backed up with 1000 stomping Gherkas leading the way for 10,000 mixed infantry from all factions who's fathers have made Canada their home) a peacefull anti seperatist group could gather. ... I guess you could say that is about the way I feel. JD P.S. I didn't leave out you zipperheads by accident. Just think you would be better as dismounted shock troops on this one. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: SUNRAY's Memory Lapse......
Quote:
|
I'm still here... reading and learning but not posting :) A little focussed on my sister at the moment though so not absorbing all this. Soon though. (sister newly diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer :( ) I'll be back.
Karmen |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016