![]() |
M4A2E8 Sherman
1 Attachment(s)
I believe the M4A2E8 Shermans were only used in Canada by the Reserves. Here is another photo of a tank minus the M1919A4 MGs.
Attachment 119877 |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Almost correct too. Can anyone spot one glaring error ? |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Ed, why do you believe only the CF Reserve used the M4A2E8’s? |
Quote:
PS: The cone on the muzzle of the machine gun was not the BFA. It was a part of what kept the barrel air-cooling shield secure to the gun. Cheers, Dan. |
Quote:
Not only for an extended place to step, but it helps to catch debris that migrates off the track while under way. I am convinced without a supporting (pun) CFTO to verify the intent, the shelf is intended as a step. The absence of one on the co-driver side suggests there was little concern about getting a face full of whatever. Slips and falls off the M4, as well as any other armour, are not encouraged. There is a core (Corps ?) group who do not need to be reminded. :cheers: |
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Do I see a small portion of the C1 SMG BFA showing? Ed: I suggest these are Reg Force troopers ... a point towards Reg Force use of the M4A2E8. |
I concur it is a BFA on the M1919. The hole is way too small for a 30 cal or 7.62 barrel bearing for live fire. As well, if you blow the photo up a little you can see the radial gas ports at the base of the BFA along with the front wrenching feature. I have never seen a barrel bearing on a M1919 that looks like this one for anything but blank fire.
|
Quote:
|
Tank Useage
Quote:
|
Webbing Patterns
Quote:
|
Quote:
A former CF fellow using nom de plume ‘Silverhawk’, Harold Skaarup, has written extensively on the history of these medium tanks. The commonly used nomenclature and technical nomenclature is ‘passionately’ discussed :fry: on other social ( ? ha !) media sites. |
Question
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
I believe there is a group (of us) on MLU Forum who were taught to “never pass a fault”. That concept does not appear to have universal acceptance.
While viewing other Ex-CF M4 gate guards from this 76mm Wet storage with HVS Suspension family, I see the same error on “Hussar” at Beechwood Cemetery, Ottawa has crept onto the Régiment de Hull tank. Or vice versa, not sure who was first ! Is it an example of a fault being accepted as correct then repeating itself? . |
On the photo in Post #33, there is a “XX-XXX” Registration Number on the front hull, just below the barrel.
Can that be used at all to ID this Sherman and who was operating it in 1967? David |
Quote:
Harold Skaarup, Maj. (ret’d) wrote: “ After the first batch of the new tanks went to the RCD at Camp Borden 1946, another 30 went to the LdSH at Camp Wainwright, Alberta in March 1947. Training on the tanks by the LdSH was also conducted at Camp Sarcee in Alberta, and at Camp Petawawa when the RCD moved there in the spring of 1948.” |
M1919a$ mg
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Reg F Sherman
1 Attachment(s)
Attached for reference, 1947/48 Camp Wainwright, Alberta. Lord Strathcona's Horse (Royal Canadians) tank park. The Shermans were used until 1952, replaced by the Centurion Mk 5's.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hi I meant to get back to this thread/photo but a recent gun camp reminded me. I do not think that there is a BFA on the M1919A4 (or the SMG) simply because of the flag on the rear Sherman. That is the Range safety Officer's vehicle that follows any live fire movement on Armoured vehicle ranges. To this day. To have BFAs on a live fire range................I dunno. Were we that stupid back then? Fotr the SMG, I also do not think it is a BFA due to the position indicated is too far back on the body of the weapon. Looks like the clip for the sling. I loved my "Small Metal Gun". http://mpmuseum.org/smgc1.html regard Darrell |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016