MLU FORUM

MLU FORUM (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/index.php)
-   WW2 Military History & Equipment (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Museums Victoria photo archive (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/showthread.php?t=33946)

Mike Kelly 17-01-23 01:30

Museums Victoria photo archive
 
3 Attachment(s)
SEC Weapons Carrier ?


BAKER MOTORS Albury: opposite Hoyts. Hoyts was a cinema chain.

Note: Chevs 25 Pounds extra ! Wow


https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/761922

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/762198

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/762199

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469829

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469615

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469612

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469533

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1714788

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1689010

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/2097033

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/763846

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469594

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469520

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469519

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469603

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1833015

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1919253

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1813067

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1484805

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1484805

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469509

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469164

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469507

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469431

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/764014

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/772061

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/792178

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/792179

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/760515

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1755011

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1755015

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469598

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/771920

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1819815

Mike Kelly 17-01-23 11:33

Baker
 
2 Attachment(s)
Mr. Baker inspecting his Tanks

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/a...er%20Motors%22

Australian built Cruiser tanks sold as scrap in 1946. Just a couple of years before 1946, all of the effort, research and manufacturing cost and it's thrown away as junk in such a short time. Madness. Were these tanks deemed to be obsolete in such a short time ? The buyer was selling crated Cadillac engines as disposals parts - these were probably spare Cruiser tank engines.

Jakko Westerbeke 18-01-23 11:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Kelly (Post 290609)
Australian built Cruiser tanks sold as scrap in 1946. Just a couple of years before 1946, all of the effort, research and manufacturing cost and it's thrown away as junk in such a short time. Madness. Were these tanks deemed to be obsolete in such a short time ?

Yes. The Sentinel was mostly inferior to tanks like the Sherman, and even the Grant and Lee in some ways. At the same time, any country that wanted tanks in 1946 could pretty much get as many Shermans as they liked, thereby also benefitting from the large amounts of spare parts available for them, unlike for the Sentinel. So, Australia had no need of Sentinels itself and no countries to sell them to either. Might as well just about give them away to anyone who thinks they have a use for them.

Mike Kelly 18-01-23 12:40

training
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakko Westerbeke (Post 290620)
Yes. The Sentinel was mostly inferior to tanks like the Sherman, and even the Grant and Lee in some ways. At the same time, any country that wanted tanks in 1946 could pretty much get as many Shermans as they liked, thereby also benefitting from the large amounts of spare parts available for them, unlike for the Sentinel. So, Australia had no need of Sentinels itself and no countries to sell them to either. Might as well just about give them away to anyone who thinks they have a use for them.


You would think the Govt. could have put the Cruisers in storage or used them for training rather than scrapping them so quickly. The drawings for the manufacture of spare parts would have been available . I guess spares for the Cadillac engines would have been an issue ? Another thing is the small number that were built was probably why they decided to declare the type as surplus to needs. The Grant/Lee was thought of as being obsolete in some circles but they kept the diesel powered version in service until the mid 1950s I think.

Mike Cecil 18-01-23 18:03

Baker Bros
 
The 'as new' Cadillacs must have been those taken out of the tanks the Baker Motors purchased. They also advertised engines at 100 pounds each. Since they purchased over 30 AC1 tanks, that's more than 90 engines to sell. Crating the engines for interim storage and sale makes sense.

The new, unused Cadillacs were sold by the CDC for the flat rate of 150 pounds each.

Not one AC1 tank was ever completed to the staqe of being a reliable, combat-ready tank.

My take on the story of the development and demise of the Aust Cruiser tank is in the book design phase with Trackpad Publishing at the moment. Should be available in the next couple of months.

Mike

Mike Kelly 19-01-23 03:27

Great
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Cecil (Post 290626)
The 'as new' Cadillacs must have been those taken out of the tanks the Baker Motors purchased. They also advertised engines at 100 pounds each. Since they purchased over 30 AC1 tanks, that's more than 90 engines to sell. Crating the engines for interim storage and sale makes sense.

The new, unused Cadillacs were sold by the CDC for the flat rate of 150 pounds each.

Not one AC1 tank was ever completed to the staqe of being a reliable, combat-ready tank.

My take on the story of the development and demise of the Aust Cruiser tank is in the book design phase with Trackpad Publishing at the moment. Should be available in the next couple of months.

Mike

Great , should be a good read !

I was mislead by this film of the AC1 tanks actually driving around. The army or somebody must have cobbled a few AC1 tanks into running condition for the Dept. of Information movie cameras and the visiting 'dignitaries' including Bob Menzies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzJ8mflCXQU

Mike Cecil 19-01-23 03:53

E series
 
Nice piece of footage. Several famous faces. Those are two of the Experimental series tanks, E1 with the big fake barrel and E2 with a 2-pdr, being demonstrated for the big wigs at Fisherman's Bend in early 1942. E1 retired hurt with a broken track. There were three AC-E series tanks built before the production run of 65 AC1 tanks.

Most of the 65 production AC tanks were assembled and drivable by the close of the project, but far from reliable or combat-ready. I'd like to think the book covers the subject in sufficient detail - it's about 100,000 words supported by 430-odd images. The ultimate judgement of that will be the readers, of course, but I've done my best.

Interesting to see a camouflaged Mortar carrier amongst the swarm of AFVs.

Mike

Mike Kelly 19-01-23 07:06

Sad end
 
1 Attachment(s)
Sad end to WW1 aircraft.

Can anybody ID the 4 bladed aircraft in the background ?

https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1602920

Jakko Westerbeke 19-01-23 11:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Kelly (Post 290622)
You would think the Govt. could have put the Cruisers in storage or used them for training rather than scrapping them so quickly.

I suspect they felt that storing tanks costs even more money, while selling them for scrap metal at least brings back some of the investments. Never underestimate beancounters …

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Kelly (Post 290622)
The drawings for the manufacture of spare parts would have been available

But who would want to tool up to make those parts if there are warehouses full of Sherman spares in the USA and elsewhere?

michaelkoudstaal 19-01-23 12:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Cecil (Post 290633)
Nice piece of footage. Several famous faces. Those are two of the Experimental series tanks, E1 with the big fake barrel and E2 with a 2-pdr, being demonstrated for the big wigs at Fisherman's Bend in early 1942. E1 retired hurt with a broken track. There were three AC-E series tanks built before the production run of 65 AC1 tanks.

All three if you look closely. Most of the footage is E1 and likely an incomplete E3, the one right at the end with no antennas or tool bins is probably the E2 being babied a bit as it was supposed to be sent of for gunnery trials the next day so you wouldn't want to break it.

Mike Cecil 19-01-23 17:06

E1 & e2
 
Cannot agree, Michael: check the driver's hatch design for verification. This is E1 and E2. E3 was still being built at Eveleigh when this demo took place.

Mike

Mike Kelly 20-01-23 11:15

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/1469617
 
2 Attachment(s)
https://collections.museumsvictoria..../items/1469617

https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/items/775817

A side note: I spotted somebody selling four of these 4.2 inch Mortar rounds at the swap meet I was at recently , they were packed in their shipping box. The seller had a sign explaining how they were first used at El Alamein

michaelkoudstaal 20-01-23 11:47

2 Attachment(s)
That is what the records say, E3 wasn't complete on that day. But there's three different looking tanks being driven around. You might explain away the loss of the partial sand shields, and the track guard toolbins, as simply "bits falling off" over the course of the run, but the antennas too? It's not like they're driving under trees or anything. I think they've been told to put on a show and while E3 wasn't finished it might have been drivable and that's what's in the film. I don't know that I'd put money on it, but that's what it looks like.
Attachment 132369Attachment 132370

Mike Cecil 21-01-23 07:12

E1 and E2 but not E3
 
Hi Michael,
We seem to be hijacking Mike K's thread here, but what the heck: Hanno will hive it off if he thinks it is inappropriate.

The three images:

E1 - agreed.
E2 - agreed. note that the short stretch of film has no other vehicles visible. This short section of film I suggest was taken on an earlier date, prior to the fitting of the items you point out. Also note the prominent forward-opening hatch on the driver's position, painted white on the inside face - a salient feature of E2, as E1 never had the hatch cover fitted to the opening, and E3 had a very different hatch design that did not fold forward.

E3- this is E2 on the day of the event, with the additional fittings. Note the big, white drivers hatch visible in the open position, just under & forward of the MG armoured housing. E3 did not have a forward opening driver's hatch: it had access via a double hatch on the flat above the driver's head.

Two other features to consider: E3 left Eveleigh fitted with Mk.2 suspension brackets, and the aerial mounts were on angle brackets welded one to each side of the turret, not on the back as on E2. The image you are saying is of E3 has Mk.1 suspension brackets and no angle bracket for the aerial on the turret side, but on the turret back as for E2.

Regards

Mike

michaelkoudstaal 21-01-23 12:12

Gotcha, I've been led astray by tricky editing in of old footage. I'd thought I'd never seen a proper photo of E3, but from your description I'm pretty sure I know the one, but for clarity, it has what looks like unusual turret ring side protection, or something similar, fitted?

Mike Cecil 21-01-23 17:08

E3
 
Yes, Michael, the image you refer to is E3 and the unusual turret ring protector is a trial fit using a piece of timber to show what it would look like.

Mike

Mike Kelly 22-01-23 03:41

Melbourne Police cars
 
5 Attachment(s)
circa 1942


https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f11c4432ce3e

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f11c4434e05b

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f11c889bf7e2

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f123684818ae

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f11c889c3177

Mike Kelly 22-01-23 09:42

https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/5546f0a82162f11c44390418
 
5 Attachment(s)
https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f11c44390418

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f11c443789be

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...62f11c4437f5d4

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...704ed38a6f70b3

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea670f609a25d4

Mike Kelly 22-01-23 10:02

https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/5e5481bd21ea671378bf1c30
 
5 Attachment(s)
https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea671378bf1c30

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea671e9c9398dc

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea690fc0d91d93

Mike Kelly 22-01-23 10:17

https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/5b317ffc21ea67176cdd6118
 
5 Attachment(s)
https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea67176cdd6118

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ore-collection

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea6b0f605b3b50

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea6d07bc1bc59f

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea670f40cd6e80

Mike Kelly 22-01-23 10:41

https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/5b724e3221ea6b0f6046396a
 
5 Attachment(s)
https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea6b0f6046396a

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea670f40c1b33a

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea6d14ac092a93

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea671378b75e77

Mike Kelly 22-01-23 11:14

https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/5afa553721ea6d14ac0ea38a
 
3 Attachment(s)
https://victoriancollections.net.au/...ea6d14ac0ea38a

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...69f50f7c48433c

https://victoriancollections.net.au/...69f50f7c483f79


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:03.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016