Bulldozer Question
 

I know its not really a CMP question but you blokes seem pretty knowledgable about these things.
In have been reading accounts of the British using D4 and D7 Bulldozers. What do these designations actually mean? I presume it is weight or something. Picture comparisons or dimensions would be useful.
The reason I ask is I read an account of the British parachuting D4s into the Borneo Jungle and as a model maker thought it might make an interesting diorama. However in 1/35 scale I can only find the resicst D7. Would it be feasable to parachute a D7 or are they way too big?
I also found a Clarke Airborne Bulldozer, how does this relate in terms of D rating?
Thanks
Paul

Clarks
 

Well size-wise the Clarks would be about D 0.01 I'd say.

It's just a size theing. The most common was the D2, and as the number got bigger so did the machine. You wouldn't want to pass off a D6 as a D4, no sir.


Gordon

The early Caterpillers were rated by weight like the "2 Ton Cat". The next ones were the 15 Cat, 20 Cat, etc but they were a bit heavier than the numbers might imply. When they came up with the "D" series they were way heavier.
The USAF tried dropping a D7 out of a Hercules in Vancouver in the 1960s and as the chutes opened they ripped off one by one but the Cat did make it to the ground, albiet in not too good of shape. They've perfected the technique since then!

Was there a concern that the Cat wouldn't make it to the ground? :)

Seen an image somewhere
 

Of one they 'chute dropped at the south pole and the chutes failed...

It made rather a large, deep hole, and wasn't in too good condition.

Oh lordy, I think I just pithed m'self...

:sheep:

When I watched it come out the back of the Herc there was no doubt in my mind that the Cat would make it to the ground! It made quite a thump when it hit and there wasn't much left that was any good!

The D number system is used by Caterpillar to denote the different crawler dozers they make. The wartime D4 weighed about 5 tons, the modern D4 tips the scales at about 9 tons. D7 wartime was about 12 tons, modern D7 is more than twice as heavy at 26 tons. I doubt that D7s could be air dropped. D4 was 62 in. wide, 122 in. long. D7, 98 in. wide, 162 in. long. Lengths are to end of drawbar.

Perry

A few years ago
 

the RNZAF were tasked to drop a dozer (don't remember what size) on to Pitcairn Island. They had a dropzone about the size of rugby field.
Mission was accomplished successfully, but there is a whole lot of empty Pacific Ocean round that wee island.

Rob

D Series
 

Just as a point of interest the "D" in Caterpillar stands for Diesel or so I'm told.... The 1931 "Diesel 60" motor built by Cat became the staple heavy machine engine used in the USA at least.
The number designated size as already mentioned..
The 1942 RD-1820 radial diesel engine was used to power the M-4 tank with the "RD" prefix standing for Radial Diesel..

Re: D Series
 

Yes The M4A6 was radial diesel powered,but only less than a 100 of them were made late in the war.

:remember :support :drunk:

Herc
 

The civy Herc we were using had a usable load of 20,000kg well below 26tons for sure. Can the military ones carry more as they may not have the same weight restrictions or was the D7 dropped out of something bigger?
Sean

Getting back to pauls question about parachuting into Borneo - I would not have thought that was achievable in the 1940s. In 1944 there was only limited success parachuting Jeeps.

As to sizes & weights this from the Trux web site
Above weights relate to the Tractor only with no allowance for Dozer blade, Winch Etc.

I know that a few Clark Airbourne dozers were used by the british in Europe but were landed by glider Think the same was true in Borneo

Noel

Weights of tractors
 

Looking at the two posts above, it appears that a WW2 vintage D7 (tractor only) could have been transported and possibly dropped from a Hercules. Most construction machinery gets heavier over time for the same model name as part of the competition to say "my toy is better than yours". Current production D7 weighs between 56 and 60 thousand pounds (operating) or 46 to 50 for shipping. Horsepower is now quoted as 240. Quite a change from the earlier versions.

Between the 60 and the D6 there was the RD6 so it could have been around 6 tons. The designation numbers likely originated based on the actual weights but as stated above the weights got heavier over time.
All I know about the Herc's payload is they could lift a D7. The newer versions could likely heft a little more.
Here's a pic of a wartime D7 and a Clark airborne dozer in approximately the same scale. This is a lot like comparing pigs and chickens!

Thanks for all the imput.
The picture is from the Royal Engineers Museum in the UK. It shows a static display of a D4 Bulldozer on a medium stressed platform dropped by parachute into Borneo from a Beverley Transporter so it must be 1950s or 60s.
My question was could they deliver a D7 via the same route?

Airdropped
 

The C119 Boxcar can lift 20,000lbs I believe . So it could have handled the D4 no sweat. Did the Brits use this aircraft also?
Sean

Back in the '70s the CAF used to demonstrate both JATO take-offs and LAPES drops from a C-130 at the Abbotsford International Airshow. The load dropped was a small bulldozer sans blade, but it was always VERY impressive to see. They stopped doing this about the same time as I heard through the grapevine that the JATO bottles were over stressing the airframes and that an aircraft was lost during an operational LAPES somewhere. I've included a pic of a LAPES:

Lapes
 

Indeed there was an aircraft lost with all aboard while conducting LAPES at CFB Namao, late 70's early 80's? due to the load hanging up after the chutes had deployed however, I beleive that the system is still practiced today.
Needless to say, that even from the ground LAPESing is a sphincter tightener.

Cheers

Lapes
 

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=pRhFRGzh0s0

Hopefully this works....an oldie but a goodie

:cheers:

Mike

What look like a rough terrain fork lift dropped from the Herc on a low pass, must have broke the land speed record for that type of vehicle....... :thup2:

It definitely wasn't feasible to para drop a D7 or even a D4 in WWII, at least out of a transport. The reason why? No aircraft existed during that time with a rear ramp that could be opened in flight. The C82 had a rear ramp, but the clamshell fairing couldn't be opened in flight. It would have been suicide to push a D4 out the door of a C46 or C47 in flight as the shift in C. of G. would cause a crash long before the dozer could have been manhandled out. I'll include a pic showing the effort taken to load a D4 into a C47...now try that while the aircraft is flying! I guess a dozer could have been slung beneath the bomb bay of a large bomber...I don't think it would fit inside, at least not completely. It would create terrible drag and probably adversely effect the handling of the bomber. I never heard of such a thing and doubt it ever happened. Derek.


(P.S.) Hmmm, it's not allowing me to upload a picture of several grunts manhandling a D4 into a Skytrain. Oh well, these days I'm happy to simply be able to post a reply!

I'll try the upload for you Derek
 

Here goes...

Too big for a D4
 

Thanks Kieth, much appreciated! Y'know, after taking a good look at the dozer being loaded into the C47 in this pic, it's too small to be a D4, I wonder if it's a CA-1?

bulldozer
 

Hi First I will say that the older cats pre 1936 numbers stood for horse power .A 30 cat had 30 HP a 60 had 60HP .The 35 was the first deisel .The R series were R being a gas ,RD is a deisel The RD 2,4,6,8 and some U series were the Catipiller modles used in the ww2 .I put a D7 in a Hurculies aircraft in Yellowknife where it was hauled to the artic we had to remove all the dozer parts ,blade and C frame maily because it was too wide ,not too heavy .I might add that these cats did not have canopies on them and when working in the bush kild alot of operaters from the tree tops comming down on them .Some were sheeted in with iron and used in combat They were so reliable that they made a great impact on the out come of the war George

Keith,

I agree with Sapper that it is a little baby Clarke air portable tractor.

Some Clarkair photos

the action scene is at Nadzab in the Markham Valley in New Guinea. The equipment all arrived by air.

Lang, you seem to have the same interest in the ClarkAir as I do. I have about 40 pictures of the little dozer and it's attachments, if you're interested in any, let me know and I'll email them to you. I've just posted to "Transporting the Clark-Air CA-1 bulldozer" regarding the temporary stub axles I've seen on them before. If you're interested, check it oout. Derek.

Probably a bit off track?!
 

I was up in the Ramu Valley with my father in early December 2005. He was 7th division 2nd/25th infantry battalion and had fought up in the Markim and Ramu valleys. He showed mum and myself where he had fought – main battle/skirmish being at the site of Kesawai village. We also went to Kiapit and a distant look at Shaggy Ridge.
While up in that area we stayed at the Ramu Sugar complex. We got talking to the local expatts, which wasn’t hard as they were impressed that someone of Dad’s age(82) had come to visit and pay his respects.
Anyhow it was mentioned that they had in the process of developing a new cane field came across a couple of buried little dozers that where used to develop the military airfields in WW2. Apparently a lot of equipment was buried after the Japs where driven out of Papua New Guinea. The theory being that while the war was going the allies way, they may have ended up back in PNG still having to fight. So if that was the case they would need some gear, so they buried catches of equipment just in case. That is what I was told by the expatts anyway! I don’t know as to the condition of these dozers or what happened to them. I assume that it is true due to the amount of ex-military equipment being dug up or that was left lying around and can still be seen today.
Apparently they have a hell of a time digging up Marsden matting when they develop new cane/oil palm fields. Here’s a link for those interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marston_Matting
Just to the North West of this town is the Ramu Sugar township / complex for those who are interested.
"Kaigulan" lat=-5.979949, lon=145.905197 Copy and Paste into Google earth.
I thought this might be of interest to the discussuion.

Regards
Alan Nicholas

Derek,

Always interested in Clarkairs. I have only ever seen one in Australia - well restored - at a tractor show a few years back. I have always wanted to own one. Just drove across USA and saw two in the mid-west on poles advertising earth moving companies.

lang@st.net.au