MLU FORUM

MLU FORUM (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/index.php)
-   The Softskin Forum (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   9.00-13 tire height (http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/showthread.php?t=33669)

Scott Cacciamani 04-09-22 00:38

9.00-13 tire height
 
How tall, is a vintage or otherwise 9.00 x 13 tire.
thanks

Colin Alford 04-09-22 03:42

2 Attachment(s)
Scott,

Please see the attached images from the Design Record of Canadian-Developed Military Vehicles World War II.

The height was approx 31” with variations between manufacturers.

Scott Cacciamani 04-09-22 05:51

tires
 
thanks, thats good info.
scott

Charlie Down 04-09-22 09:17

1 Attachment(s)
Hi Colin,
Do you have the data for 10.5 - 16" tyres too? Also for sand tyres?
Cheers

Tony Smith 04-09-22 10:48

1 Attachment(s)
The variations apply just as much today across different manufacturers. Here are 3 new-production 9.00-13 tyres; Left Olympic Sand Grip 30.5", Middle Bridgestone Alligator (uninflated) 29.75", right MRF Sand 30.75".

I don't think mounting the Bridgestone to a rim and inflating it would go over 30".

Grant Bowker 04-09-22 12:52

I agree with Tony that there were significant variations between manufacturers but as a rough rule of thumb, tires of that era were 100% profile (as tall as wide) so a 10.50-16 would be 16" (the rim) +2x10.5" (the tire) = 37" tall.

Having said this, the 9.25-16 used on the C8A (C8AX too?) were shorter than the 9.00-16 used on 15 cwts. I don't know of anything in the size designator to let one know this was a "low profile" tire.

Scott Cacciamani 06-09-22 02:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin Alford (Post 288467)
Scott,

Please see the attached images from the Design Record of Canadian-Developed Military Vehicles World War II.

The height was approx 31” with variations between manufacturers.

Do you have a thread profile or photo of the three or ony of the 9,00x 13 tires.

Tony Smith 09-09-22 01:43

1 Attachment(s)
I have a couple of Firestone 9.00-13, but they are not a desert/sand pattern. I have never seen a Dominion or Goodrich WW2 pattern, Dunlop seems to be the most common.

Colin Alford 09-09-22 03:28

4 Attachment(s)
Scott,

Attached are some more images from the Design Record.

I do not know for certain, but I believe it is likely the the “distinct” tread designs from the various manufacturers were standard amongst the different tire sizes (Tony’s Firestone 9.00-13 tread appears the same as the Firestone 10.50-16 shown below).

While Sand Tread tires are mentioned in the design record, they receive little attention, are not detailed in the comparison charts, and there is only the attached image (in the Tire and Wheel Data section).

Charlie,

Attached is larger version of the previously posted chart which includes the 10.50-16 dimensions

Scott Cacciamani 09-09-22 14:59

tires
 
thanks again for all the great info. Tires have become a big Headache for me. I can use 14' instead of 13" rims as there are more tire options however tires still all look to modern. Just kills the look. thanks


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:25.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016