Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Blair
Vincent Bugliosi to Testify before the House Committee on the Judiciary's Hearing - "The Imperial Presidency of George W. Bush and Possible Legal Responses"
Citing Evidence Contained in Bugliosi's Bestselling Book THE PROSECUTION
OF GEORGE W. BUSH FOR MURDER
For further information: In Canada Contact: Michaela Cornell Publishers'
Services, (647) 274-6112
   |
Mr. Bugliosi is conveniently blind to the fact that on Oct. 11, 2002 both the upper and lower houses voted overwhelming in favour of military action to oust Saddam Hussein. Does he propose to indict all Senators and Representatives also? Anybody with an attention span longer than that of a gnat should remember that the
U.N. weapons inspectors left Iraq in disgust after Saddam's succesful attempts to confound them, lending credence to concerns that Iraq may be hiding WMD's.
This is the typical nonsense the Libro-crats trot out every election year (remember Michael Moore's anti-Republican propaganda movie Fahrenheit 911?) in their pathetic attempts to get a Democratic president elected.
By the same test, shouldn't Paul Martin be indicted for Canada's role in Afghanistan? After all, Canada's participation was to, and I quote:
Defend Canada's national interests
Ensure Canadian leadership in world affairs
Help Afghanistan rebuild.
The world knew Afghanistan had no WMD's and therefore was no threat to Canada, yet we still sent troops. And
please
don't tell me it was to help the poor down trodden Afghanis to escape the yoke of tyranny that Canada should be held harmless for our actions there without applying the same argument to U.S. actions in Iraq.
Stuff and nonsense!