Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark W. Tonner
Yes, they wouldn't have been C15TA's - when the War Establishment for ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ - Cdn II/251/2 - came into effect (Feb 44), the 'Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4' would have been referring to the 'White, M3A1, 15-cwt, 4x4'
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John McGillivray
Mark, the designation “Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured Personal” was used for both the C15TA and the White Scout Car as shown CMHQ Report 141. There was a separate designation for the Half-track. The C15TA only started to arrive in May 1944. In June the establishment called for 414 “Truck, 15-cwt Armoured Personnel”. However the Canadians in NWE only held 179. The short fall was made up by using International Half Tracks. The assault troops of 17DoY, RCH were using half tracks when they went into Normandy which were gradually replaced by the C15TA. Note except for one example used by SAR for their ACV the Canadians did not use the White Halftrack M3A1.
|
Hi John;
I’m not really sure what you are trying to say, but ...
The designation I used for the White Motor Company built American CAR, SCOUT, M3A1, 4x4 of 'Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4' in response to Bruce Parker’s question is the designation that appears in both the War Establishment for ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ - Cdn II/251/2 (effective 21 February 1944) and in the VEHICLE DATA BOOK, Canadian Army Overseas (Pubs 167 40/P & S/2978 (6681)) that was published under direction of The Branch of the Quartermaster-General, Canadian Military Headquarters (London) in March 1944, although in this publication the designation 'Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4' is followed in brackets by: (M3A1, 15-cwt, 4x4, 131 wb).
In this same publication, the General Motors built C15TA (vehicle Code: C15TA-ARMD-1) is also given the designation of 'Truck, 15-cwt, Armoured, 4x4' and is followed in brackets by: (15-cwt, 4x4, 101 wb), but as we know, the C15TA didn’t start to arrive in the UK until May 1944, with only 21 having been issued to units of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division by month’s end.
In regards to Half-tracks, in the above mentioned publication and in subsequent Canadian WE’s that I’ve seen, Half-tracks bare the simple designation of ‘Truck, 15-cwt, Half-track’ regardless of their task, except for instances of if fitted for wireless, they appear as ‘Truck, 15-cwt, Half-track, FFW’.
In my original response to Randy’s question, maybe I should not have used the leading words: “
The vehicles used by the 7th Reconnaissance Regiment (17th Duke of York's Royal Canadian Hussars), C.A.C. of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division ...”, but instead said “
That to give you an idea of what vehicles the 7th Reconnaissance Regiment (17th Duke of York's Royal Canadian Hussars), C.A.C. of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division may have been equipped with, the following is the vehicle portion of the War Establishment for ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ (Cdn. II/251/2 - effective 21 February 1944), which is the War Establishment their issue of vehicles would have been based on for comparison to what the Trux site states was the British War Establishment for a Reconnaissance Regiment (WE II/251/2 - effective December 1943) ...”.
I should also maybe have explained in my original post the difference between what the WE of ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ (Cdn. II/251/2) stated was to be the scale of transport issue and what the units sometimes received in lieu of. I merely quoted the scale of transport issue as called for under the War Establishment for ‘A Reconnaissance Regiment, C.A.C.’ (Cdn. II/251/2) that was authorized at the time that the WE came into effect (12 Feb 44), for the ‘Divisional Reconnaissance Regiment’ of both the 2nd and 3rd Canadian Infantry Divisions (14th Canadian Hussars and the 17th Duke of York's Royal Canadian Hussars, respectively).
Cheers