View Single Post
  #462  
Old 26-05-12, 12:51
Private_collector's Avatar
Private_collector Private_collector is offline
Tony Baker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wide Bay, QLD, Australia.
Posts: 1,819
Default TAC unit & PASS design

After much playing around with different fonts, these are the ones which may suit. The military directions regarding font size and type are making it VERY hard to keep this historically accurate. When using the correct height and width of font for the unit numbers, it fills the entire plate, leaving bugger all space either side. And thats with a font that is still a little smaller than specified. This problem is due in no small part to the signage I need for my Fathers unit, 29-46 Inf Btn.

It's a bit like 'Goldilocks'
Click image for larger version

Name:	TAC sign 4.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	58.9 KB
ID:	49423
This one's too small.....
Click image for larger version

Name:	TAC sign 5.jpg
Views:	4
Size:	38.4 KB
ID:	49424
This one's too big....
Click image for larger version

Name:	TAC sign 6.jpg
Views:	6
Size:	58.3 KB
ID:	49425
This 'bastardised' version, while not entirely following the regulations, does match two similar plates I have seen in original photos where the unit had a lot of numbers to fit on the plate. So I guess this one could be......Just Right Maybe. I'm over it for now
Click image for larger version

Name:	TAC sign PASS.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	51.6 KB
ID:	49426
On a happier note, this mock-up of the PASS side of the plate looks just about right compared to the drawings as shown in military regulations documents.

Once I settle on my requirements, I will take the 'mock-ups' to sign cutting place on Monday afternoon. They will probably tell me "Oh no sir, we don't have any of those fonts. At which point I will strike them roughly.....and run away laughing insanely

__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still)
Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder)
Reply With Quote