Thanks Lauren
Interesting... Values are all over the place depending on source. The top armour values from some sources are confusing, 76.2mm is extremely thick for a hull roof, unless they are counting the curving hull top in front of the turret, areas around the cupola etc and they are the higher values.
Examples
Hunnicutt
Hull
Upper front 76.2 - 50.8
Lower front 50.8
Sides 63.5 - 31.75
Rear 38.1
Top 25.4
Floor 25.4 - 12.7
cupola ?
Turret
Front 76.2
Sides 76.2 - 63.5
Rear 63.5
Top 25.4
Radio floor ?
AFV weapon profile #13
Hull
Front 44.45
Nose 38.1
Sides 63.5 - 31.75
Rear 38.1
Top 76.2 - 38.1
Floor 25.4
cupola ?
Turret
Front 88.9
Sides 63.5
Rear 38.1
Top 38.1
Radio floor ?
Bellona Military vehicle print no. 14
Hull
Glacis plate 50.8
Drivers plate 50.8
Nose upper 76.2 - 50.8
Nose lower 50.8
Sides upper 63.5
Sides lower 38.1
Rear 38.1
Top 38.1 - 25.4
Floor 25.4
cupola ?
Turret
Front 76.2
Sides 76.2 - 63.5
Rear ?
Top ?
Radio floor ?
Canada's pride
Turret
Front 76.2
Sides 76.2 - 63.5
Rear 63.5
Top 25.4
Radio floor?
Hull
Front upper 76.2
Front lower 50.8
Sides 63.5 - 31.75
Rear 38.1
Top 38.1 - 25.4
Floor 25.4 - 12.7
Cupola (no value given one paragraph mentions "thicker then M3, the M3 cupola was roughly 2 inches as far as I know")
Ram MK I for example from the archives and some weights (MK II has the same values other then weight)
http://i.imgur.com/WmO1AFp.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/8jXfvEo.jpg