That may be partially my fault, as I have since learned. I have amended the initial post to reflect who is missing it and who was circulating it.
As to being behind on artifact accessioning and processing, I would like to meet the museum that isn't. As much as you try to catch up, or adapt to whatever database is new this decade, the stuff just keeps coming in. Hopefully the CFSMEM's hiring of a company to do the work makes some good headway along with quality archiving. Nothing worse than something being accessioned under the wrong description, and stored away. Well except if it walks away I guess.
|