MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-21, 23:24
Charlie Down Charlie Down is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 140
Default LRDG Pattern condensers

On the Chevrolet 1533X2 trucks there are 2 different types of condenser. The most common has a can with a pipe connected to the radiator and the cap on the can, that ended at the bottom of the can below the water level to condense the steam, and giving a closed pressurised system. As steam was piped to the can the pressure would increase in the can, and when the radiator cooled the positive pressure in the can would force the condensed steam back into the radiator, preventing lose of water by vented steam. Simple and straight forward to me, although I'm not sure how the pressure was controlled without a pressure relief system, or was it merely a case of keeping an eye on the temperature gauge?
However the other type has a second smaller diameter tube exiting the top of the condenser and then bending down the side of the can. I presume this was some sort of pressure relief tube. Would this pipe be below the water level in the can, in which case the pressure build up would force water out of it very quickly, or was it above the water level in which case the can wouldn't become pressurised. The third option would be for it to be above the water line but it would have a pressure relief valve on it. This pressure relief valve would have to be fitted to the smaller pipe before sealing the can up.
The first photo shows a can without the second tube, the second photo show the tube and the brackets that held it and the condenser can on the side of the truck. This doesn't appear to be a case of early and late condensers, they seem to have both been used early after the operational debut of the trucks.
So how does this system compare to later condensers on CMP trucks, and is my theory right or have I missed something?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Condenser 1.jpg (234.8 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg condenser 3.jpg (92.0 KB, 15 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-21, 04:23
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Both types must be vented, steam will not "Flow" into a dead-end chamber.

The Radiator Cap is a pressurised type of only around 4psi. As this opens, the pipe and condensor can (if not vented) will equally pressurise to 4psi (or higher), and nothing will flow. With nothing flowing into the Can, it cannot reduce the temperature of something that is not in it. The coolant temp (and pressure) will continue to rise unless the cooling capacity of the radiator can maintain temps. Beside the Rad Cap, there is no other means to regulate or relieve pressure in the system.

While the Condensor Can primarily condenses steam back to water by filtering it below fluid level, it also contributes to cooling the steam/liquid by being remotely mounted from the engine bay. While the Condensor Can can get warm, I've never known them to be hot to touch, or as hot as the Radiator. I've never seen steam or coolant issuing from the vents.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Down
So how does this system compare to later condensers on CMP trucks,..
Both Ford and Chev CMPs had Condensors from initial production ex Factory, they are not later than the 1533. While of a differing construction, both types work on the same principle of the inlet pipe from the radiator entering the tank below a fluid level to condense any steam and/or recover liquid coolant from the radiator.

As a curiosity, I see the tanks in both your photos have a filler using the cast brass caps from 2Gal POL Cans.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-21, 10:23
Charlie Down Charlie Down is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 140
Default

Hi Tony,
Thank you for the explanation, that all makes sense.
So there will be a vent hole in the simple condenser, maybe in the cap, and the condenser with the tube which will end below water level in the can to minimise evapouration.....
Anecdotally the drivers waited until they saw water coming from the condenser, (which is alledgedly why it was mounted in front of the driver) at which time they pointed the truck into any wind, stopped, turned the engine off, and waited for the engine/radiator to cool.
So it appears that they experienced water venting from the condenser.
That sounds like a lot of water coming from the radiator in order to fill the can, although I presume the condenser would be 1/3 or 1/2 full with water anyway to have a cooling effect. Some condensers show water staining down their sides too, suggesting venting.
Also there seems to be 2 different sizes of cans with distinctly shorter/fatter and skinny/taller cans. I haven't checked to see if the size/shape relates to the simple or vent tube designs, mostly because of the poor quality of most of the photographs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-21, 17:39
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,864
Default

Are these not Chevrolet radiator overflow condenser tanks which were sold as an accessory at the time?

Ref. http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/sh...ad.php?t=31412
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-21, 17:35
Charlie Down Charlie Down is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 140
Default Other Chevrolet and CMP condensers

These are images of the CMP condenser and the Chevrolet civilian type that was offered as an accessory in the 1930's and 40's from a post on MLU. (Apologies I can't remember which one).
They both have lots of similar features but in different positions. The Civilian condenser has two tubes and the CMP one tube, but both on the bottom of the condenser, and both have a dome with a relief tube inside on the top.
The last photo shows another type of condenser on a LRDG Chevrolet 1311X3 from about the same time period,. The can seems to be a lighter duty version with a rolled top rim, not a welded/brazed plate.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Condenser 4.jpg (481.4 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg condenser 5.jpg (269.0 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg Condenser 6.jpg (196.2 KB, 5 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-21, 21:28
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Down View Post
These are images of the CMP condenser and the Chevrolet civilian type that was offered as an accessory in the 1930's and 40's from a post on MLU. (Apologies I can't remember which one).
Ehm... see the link above?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-21, 01:05
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Smith View Post
As a curiosity, I see the tanks in both your photos have a filler using the cast brass caps from 2Gal POL Cans.
And as distinct from the both the Chev CMP Condensor and the Ford CMP Condensor, these tanks fitted to the LRDG Trucks have a filler cap to presumably pre-fill the condensor to say 1/3 capacity to condense steam from first operation to maximise conservation of coolant.

As the inlet hose seems to go into the filler cap (from a 2Gal POL Can), and there are apparent variations in the cans, I would suggest that these are not factory made, but made in Base Workshops as a theatre modification.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-06-21, 03:59
Charlie Down Charlie Down is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 140
Default

Hanno, somehow missed that link. Not very impressive considering its my posting!
Tony, I agree, the variation in can sizes and design, as well as the quality of the finish, suggests a Base Workshop fabrication.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-06-21, 10:33
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

In the last photo in post #5 I think that the pipe most likely enters the can behind the cap, not through it. If it entered through it the cap would not unscrew, particularly as the pipe is at a bit of an angle which would be an unlikely feature if it were in the cap. I think that it is just luck that the photo was taken in a way that the pipe lines up with the cap.

David
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-06-21, 05:50
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Charlie, here are some thoughts. Some probably slightly off topic, but cooling system related:
Water pushed from the rad. into the overflow tank stays there until the engine cools and sucks said water back into the radiator. This is achieved because that pipe into the (overflow) tank goes almost to the bottom of the tank.
Most vehicles (Tony) used early in the war did not have pressurised cooling systems, just a plain filler cap. Fords, Chevs (ref. MB-C1) Dodge and most British trucks were like this. The pressure system was adopted during the war.
Overflow tanks work with both pressure and open systems.
Thermostats were alcohol filled (bellows type) these were usually wrecked if the engine boiled. (modern wax type are much better and fail when open)
Deserts are stinking hot in the day time but usually freeze at night necessitating the use of alcohol based antifreeze. (this lowers the boiling point of water)
Although Chevs had "steam pipes", if they were producing steam, they were already in trouble.
As Tony said, all the overflow tanks had to be vented. Any negative pressure in the system would collapse the radiator as it cooled.(assuming pressure had escaped)
The downward pointing breather pipe reduces loss from the system.
The cooling systems of the era contained a larger volume (for a given power output) of water, that had a "margin of safety" that modern vehicles dont have.
The top of most radiators stood high above the top of the engine, which was a hang over from the time of no water pump. They were called a "thermosyphon" system. The water circulates from the fact that the hot water moved to the top, constantly.
The thermostat is in the system to get the best out of your engine. The longest life and best power output comes from operating inside the designed heat range. So the thermostat is there to keep your engine hot. Cooling it is another departments responsibility.
Btw, you can see by the welding at the top of the can (2nd photo) that that can is local manufacture
A modern style radiator pressure cap not only holds pressure in the system, it also has a valve to let air (or coolant) back into the system as it cools. It's the little bit in the middle.
I hope this lot helps some people.
Check out the sole of the passengers boot.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 13-06-21 at 05:53. Reason: added last line.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indian Pattern Carrier, Wheeled (NZ Pattern) Tony Smith The Armour Forum 14 11-10-21 15:12
LRDG Truck Alastair Thomas The Softskin Forum 0 04-02-20 10:36
LRDG-Chevy or not? Kuno The Softskin Forum 12 24-12-19 20:14
C30 cab 11 in LRDG? Nech The Softskin Forum 2 21-05-16 11:30
LRDG Chev on E-bay Tony Smith For Sale Or Wanted 12 01-10-05 20:20


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016