|
|
#2
26-12-05, 07:43
|
||||
|
||||
OK no hits so lets see if you guys agree with me.
Would the leaver for the hydrolic unit have been located in the same place as the winch control assuming that the truck was not also fitted with a winch? I base this on the fact that the hydrolic pump was transfer case operated. cheers Cliff  PS> I only ask this dumb question 'cause apart from photos I have never seen a real CMP tipper with the hoist up or any other tipper of a similer type up either and while I understand the princibles behind the theory I am not an 'equipment plant' person. 
|
|
#3
26-12-05, 11:15
|
|||
|
|||
|
cmp tipper
Cliff
Saw this one at Alice Springs , tipper with a winch . Jim S.
__________________
jim sewell cmp and cckw
|
|
#4
26-12-05, 11:17
|
|||
|
|||
|
tipper
Controls
__________________
jim sewell cmp and cckw
|
|
#5
26-12-05, 11:19
|
|||
|
|||
|
tipper
chassis
__________________
jim sewell cmp and cckw
|
|
#6
26-12-05, 11:20
|
|||
|
|||
|
tipper
winch
__________________
jim sewell cmp and cckw
|
|
#8
26-12-05, 17:18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doctor
Quote:
In fact this is not a good prescription. It was built as a Tractor, Arty No.6 (Aust), as the data plate in the cab attests. That's why it has a winch. The tipping body is from another truck altogether.   Have a look at my page on tippers which also shows one of the first types, ironically fitted with dual rear wheels. And courtesy of Phillip Hillier of Broken Hill this shot of the interior of his F60S tipper No.3  More pics of this one here.
__________________
Film maker 42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains 42 FGT No9 (Aust) 42 F15 Keith Webb Macleod, Victoria Australia Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
