![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is this truck?
Thanks Attilio |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I think it is a Morris C8 anti tank gun portee. Wheels & Tracks No 30 has a good article on these vehicles, which was designed to carry a 2 Pdr antitank gun. Regards Nick Balmer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks!
Where i can find Wheels and Trucks? I have purchased one issue some year ago but today i am unable to find the site of the magazine in the net. Thanks Attilio |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Check here.. http://www.cmvmag.co.uk/cgi-bin/show...heelsandtracks
__________________
Alex Blair :remember :support :drunk: |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks!
Attilio |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
See threads:
http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/sh...ghlight=portee http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/sh...ghlight=portee I believe it's a C.S.8/AT anti-tank. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need some explanations about the Morris portee.
According to David Hayward: 1) the original 2 pounder portee was based on the Morris 4x2 CS8 chassis 2) the Morris 4X4 C8/MG was derived from C8/QUAD field artillery tractor 3) the Morris C8/AT 2 pounder portees very similar to the Chevrolet FAT derivatives On the contrary in the book of Vanderveen the author stated that the Morris Commercial C8/AT was a C8/MG modified to gun tractor. Was the Morris C8/AT effectively an derived from C8/MG? The vehicle in the photo of tank museum that i have posted here is more similar to the C8/MG. The shape of the mudguards (three piece flat) is very different from that of Morris CS8 This is an Indian Morris C8/MG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On the contrary this is a Morris CS8 portee (with bofors 37 mm)
Any comment is appreciated Thanks Attilio |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If I may then cheat and quote from my own notes: Quote:
Another derivative of the CS.8 4 x 2 was the C8/MG Mobile Gun followed by the C8/AT 2-pounder gun portee. The former had three-piece flat mudguards, whereas the FATs had round mudguards. The /MG and /AT models became obsolete in British service by 1943 and although a large number were sold to New Zealand, many were rebuilt along with the basically similar C.8/P Predictor trucks to C.8/AT Mark III 17-pounder tractors or the airportable version, by MCC at Adderley Park, Birmingham. The real answer was therefore that the C.S.8T formed the loose basis for derivative 4 x 4 chassis, with the /MG and /AT portees using standard WD-design bodies of which detailed drawings were sent to Canada. Guy designed their Quad-Ant from the 15-cwt 4 x 2 Ant, the C.S.8T rival, and because Guy Motors could not cope with the WD demand for FATs MCC was contracted to build a very similar outline version which was loosely based on the C.S.8T through the wooden-bodied prototype C.8/FWD. In my opinion it was really a case of multiple divergent evolution, and not a strict sequential model development. As I said, Canada received and binned the pre-war WD 2-pounder drawings. A short time later the WD shipped a MCC C.8/FWD and a Guy Quad-Ant to Ottawa with detailed drawings representing the 4 x 4 FAT design. These were then taken up by GM of Canada with Ford of Canada, and begat the C-GT and then the F-GT. Note I believe that it was this way round! However the 2-pounder drawings were pulled out of the bin and subsequently the DND agreed to a request for a British order for 2-pounder portees and GM of Canada accepted the contract and adapted their C-GT chassis to take a copy of the WD body with a modified #12 open cab which became the # 42 cab. The Portee chassis were interspersed with C-GT chassis on the line in batches though I believe that they lacked the C-GT winch? Comparing serial numbers shows no difference: they had the same model number. It is just possible that Oshawa even converted built-up C-GTchassis on the line. When the Chevrolet 2-pounder portees became obsolete, those not sold to New Zealand were rebuilt, probably by GM Limited in England, to 17-pounder A/T tractors whereas the later # 43 cab C60L 6-pounder portees were rebuilt as G/S trucks with a modified # 43 cab. This thread has some more information: http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/sh...rriscommercial Last edited by David_Hayward (RIP); 24-01-06 at 23:11. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
These are my known 1941 Model chassis:
11844010482 1844012843 1844012961[PORTEE?] >>>>>>A/TANK PORTEE 1844013289 ENGINE # XR3,709,130 PAINT F.C.98 [IN N.Z.] 1844013828 1844013951 1844013992 1844014026 1844021385 ENGINE # XR3,735,940 1844024391 1844024637 1844024806 1844024849 1844025071 1844025194 1844025305 ENGINE # XR3,742,940 1844025673 1844025958 1844026425 ENGINE # XR3,756,023 BODY 2868 1844026589 1844031322 1844031330 >>>>>84-40X2 A/TANK PORTEE 1844031352 ENGINE # XR3,759,384 PAINT FC98 [IN N.Z.] 1844031394 >>>> 84-40X2 1844031433 A/TANK PORTEE ENGINE # XR3,757,180 PAINT FC98 [IN N.Z.] 1844031565 [PORTEE?] 1844031586 [PORTEE?] 1844031599 1844031619 1844031681 1844031703 1844031706 1844031799 >>>>>1844031825 A/TANK PORTEE ENGINE NUMBER XR3,742,886 # L4595318 NOVEMBER 21 1941 >>>>>1844031840 A/TANK PORTEE ENGINE NUMBER XR3,742,962 # L4594778 [NOVEMBER 21 1941] 1844031842[PORTEE?] 1844031932 >>>>>1844032663 ENGINE # XR 3,757,585 BODY SERIAL 3655 PAINT FC98 [IN N.Z.] 1844078896 1844081674 See where the KNOWN Portees intersperse. However some of the above may also have been Portees of course. 2. Known and possible Portee chassis: 1844013289 ENGINE # XR3,709,130 1844012961[PORTEE?] 1844031352 ENGINE # XR 3,759,384 1844031433 ENGINE # XR3,757,180 S/M 2028 1844031565 [PORTEE?] 1844031586 [PORTEE?] 1844031825 ENGINE NUMBER XR3,742,886 S/M 2028 # L4595318 NOVEMBER 21 1941 1844031840 W.D. # L4594778 ENGINE # XR3,742,962 S/M 2028 1844031842 [PORTEE?] 1844032663 ENGINE # XR3,757,585 Example of build plate: GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA MADE IN GM CANADA OSHAWA WALKERVILLE REGINA MODEL 84-40x2 SERIAL 1844013289 ENGINE 3709130 BODY SERIAL 606 TRIM XR PAINT F.C.98 On another brass plate: Contract no V.4229, Supply Mech 2028. Note that the Ministry of Supply placed two contracts: V.4229 was a domestic one, and the overseas order was S/M 2028, the same as for C-GT tractors. Further, when the Portees were rebuilt to 17-pounder tractors the Census Number prefix changed from 'L' as a 3-tonner truck chassis, to 'H' as a 'tractor'. The C-GT chassis retained the 'H' prefix throughout unless anyone knows of any being rebuilt? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your informations!
I have a further question: In a previous thread Shane Lovell http://www.mapleleafup.org/forums/sh...=morris+portee reported this document: AWM 54: 425/116 Australian LO Report No 21 dated 14 May 1941 I asked whether Aust units would receive Morris 4 wheel drive Portees. BRA indicated that they are unsatisfactory and that British units were to be equipped with 3-ton vehicles converted for Portee, on the basis of five per troop. In view of this disappointing situation regarding Morris Tractors it is suggested that we examine also the problem of converting 3-ton vehicles for Portee purposes. Our immediate requirement is of course the refit of 1 A.Tk Regt on a 36 gun basis. David, do you think that the Morris 4 wheel drive mentioned in this report was the C8/MG? Thanks Attilio |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe you may be right Attilio...probably C.8/AT though.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It appears as though the earlier C.8/MG Mobile Gun hd no winch, whereas the /AT portee had ramps to load the 2-pounder.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have just found out in my notes on the DND papers that you might just find interesting:
Quote:
The body drawings for the Cavalry Portee were entitled ‘body No. 1 Mk. II Schedule S (V) 339', spread over seven sheets. It appears as though the Portee file was under reference H.Q. 38-72-316, Clive, and complied with WD Specification 36B Parts I & IIC. Does anyone know who actually built the Chevrolet 2-pdr Portee bodies by any lucky chance please? As an aside and I shall move this bit when the new thread starts, WD Specification 36-B with part II.C was ‘For a 4-wheeled chassis for use as a military load-carrier of 15-cwt. capacity’. Body Specification M.C. 205-A was for ‘M.T. [Motor Transport] Vehicles-Bodies for- General Specification’. The drawing was S(V)411 - Mk. III Body. The Drawing for the Mounting under the body (D.D. (V) 355 )was for ‘Truck, 15-cwt., 4-wheeled, GS Arrangement showing mounting of Marks I and II bodies on Morris-Commercial C.S.8T, Commer ‘Beetle’ and Guy ‘Ant’ chassis’. These were then copied and retained by the DND. So if you wondered why the 15-cwt CMPs had similar bodies to the 15 cwt MCC C8T Series III, Guy Ant et al, well as per the Portee bodies the DND had the detailed specs and drawings to hand. |
![]() |
|
|