![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Niels Vegger noted this ad: https://milweb.net/webvert/a7619/106724
Is this for real? I have never seen any evidence of this being built during WW2. Quote:
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to see a lot more photos and some dimensions of this vehicle before passing judgement. One far shot is just not enough.
Also more information on how it moves in the water; prop and rudders or via the road wheels? At the moment, the reality of this vehicle can range from complete fake at one end of the spectrum to it being a sole example or sole survivor of a limited piliot project built by Chevrolet Canada. To the latter possibility, GM Canada may have seen a need to have an alternate vehicle to the USA built DUKW, for any number of reasons during the war and developed something for trials. Trials may have been a failure, or a complete success, but anticipated need never materialized. Much more documentation, details and photos of this vehicle are needed to fairly evaluate it however. Not something to drop the asking price on otherwise. David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find it odd that such a vehicle could have been built, tested, landed in Sicily, but no mention about it in the Design Branch Records. Never say never, but.........
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was curious about that as well, Rob, but am not familiar enough with the Design Branch documentation to know if it covered everything ever thought of during the war, or only equipment that actually made it into full production?
My thought was that perhaps GM perceived a need to supplement DUKW production, in some form or other, and saw advantages for them doing so via a CMP version. they may have gone as far as building one or more pilot vehicles, advising the Canadian Army what they were up to in the process. If the concept was being fully funded by GM and not interfering with GM's existing obligations in any way, the Army/Government may have gone along for the ride and helped where they could. The vehicle may have been a dud, or a success that was subsequently no longer needed...end of story. If that were the case, would it ever have made it into the Design Branch records? What I cannot figure out, however, is how one or more pilot vehicles may have survived all these years in Europe and that flows back into my concerns about the lack of information about this vehicle being offered for sale. If it were mine, I would have been screaming from the rooftops about it from the moment I found it, throughout any restoration work, to try and learn as much as possible about it. But then my wife says I am weird. Just a thought. Is there a DUKW expert out there familiar enough with the production history of that vehicle who might know it there were any production capacity concerns with it in 1941/1942 that would have prompted GM to consider alternate manufacturing? David |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back in 2010 Mark Tonner had some info on DUKWs used in Italy with Canadians.
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given the number of vehicles used by the 1st Canadian Division from the landings in Sicily through to the end of the war in Germany, and how few, if any, have survived to this day; I am really curious how such a 'rare' vehicle has ended up for sale in Germany?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chrysler Forward control amphibious | Robin Craig | Post-war Military Vehicles | 72 | 14-10-23 13:18 |
Amphibious landings | Mike K | WW2 Military History & Equipment | 0 | 31-05-16 04:45 |
For Sale: GPA - Amphibious Jeep Project | Brett Nicholls | For Sale Or Wanted | 0 | 28-08-13 15:08 |
Amphibious truck sinks in Liverpool | motto | The Sergeants' Mess | 3 | 22-06-13 22:31 |
Is this a Vickers Amphibious Tank in China? | Nick Balmer | The Armour Forum | 4 | 31-10-04 14:31 |