![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi,
I would say that in the period between the D-Day and liberation of Paris there were three Allied divisions that had the worst image. According to my personal estimation, in virtue of the Western books I know, I would say that this "ranking list", from the worst to "less bad", is as follows: 1. French 2nd Armoured Division. 2. Polish 1st Armoured Division. 3. US 90th Infantry Division. 4. The British unit? I have never seen British division chosen by historians and media to show it as an example of bad behavior and/or poor training, organization and experience. 5. The Canadian? Maybe 4th Armoured Division criticized permanently under GOC George Kitching Command or maybe 3rd Infantry Division though in this case it may be mainly GOC Keller's image problem? One more time I want to emphasize the "image" word which is lesser historic and scientific category, more public relations category, and not necessarily must be truth. What can we read about the French 2nd Armoured Division: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Best regards C. ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Excellent subject, will see if I can find similar quotes. H. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() I hope that our French colleagues or observers only will not feel it an affront. As you can see for a longer time I am able to look objectively also at our Polish 1st Armoured Division and to laugh at various things the unit did in the ETO. I admire these men and respect them but the history is only a history and no ideal units at the wars. Best regards C. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|