MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 28-03-04, 21:57
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,910
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Murray
I have not yet found some other interesting stuff in my cellar but I do know I have (...) several Marmon Herrington original catalogs from the late 1930s to the mid 1950s that may add to this field of research.

I hope everyone understands that I do not want to stray too far from the CMP theme but there is really a lot of inter-connection between the pure CMP vehicles,
Bill,

Actually, Ford/Marmon-Herrington and CMP vehicles are related. This is confirmed by the quote from the AEDB Design Record below, and also by the picture I found in a pre-WW2 Marmon-Herrington brochure. Said picture shows a short wheelbase gun tractor prototype built by M-H for the Canadian War Department on a Ford COE chassis - this is what I believe the predecessor of the CMP Field Artillery Tractor. So please dig out those original Marmon-Herrington catalogs - like you say they are bound to add to this field of research!

Regards,
Hanno


"Immediately after the war was declared, the Ford Motor Company of Canada were charged with the responsibility of developing a 4x4 truck for army use. Obviously, they had very little experience in this field [...] Consequently they went to the Marmon-Herrington Company, Indianapolis, who in peace time supplied conversion material to convert Standard Ford 4x2 trucks into 4x4 models for various commercial peace time usage. [...] these joints were unsuitable [...] [the weight of the more or less cab over engine design and heavy army wheels/tires put too much load on the front axle joints.] To solve this problem, "Bendix-Weiss and Rzeppa joints were chosen by General Motors and Ford respectively [...] [They later realized that the "Tracta" type was better but they were already tooled up with the above types, so left it as it was.] (The AEDB Design Record, Vol. 4, p. 27).
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016