MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 10-01-05, 09:21
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Military ratings

Richard, the official WD rating for the MCC etc. 4 x 4 chassis that the GTs were based on was supposedly 15 cwt.* On the basis that 'capacity' was roughly doubled, e.g. with the 1 1/2-tonner Chevrolets and GMCs to 3-tonners, 30-cwt. capacity seems to fit in with your suggestion. I believe that the FATs did indeed have an official '30-cwt.' capacity, as stated for the 2-pdr. C-GT chassis Portees..some of these were of course converted in 1943 to GS trucks! The WD envisaged that the Portee was to be a 15-cwt. chassis pre-war, duly adapted and this fits in yet again with the British GT weights. That said the DND listed the CMP FATs in the 60-cwt. class and I believe I will make a case based on the research that it was the FATs that were the basis for the heavier trucks. I have had an independent opinion on this point and the consenus is that the all the evidence points to the FATs preceding the 30-cwt and 3-ton 4 x 4 chassis. If the FATs were '30-cwt'' capacity trucks, albeit in the 3-ton class officially, and the 30-cwt. F30S/C60S were adapted therefrom, what engineering work was required to create a 3-tonner therefrom? Is it possible to list apart from chassis length the components required, such as springs, extra cross-members, etc.? I have to consider whether this could be achieved by adapting the civilian 4 x 2 3-ton chassis or whether it was 'bespoke' using civilian components only.

My opinion at the moment is that the 15-cwt. 4 x 4 chassis were developed independently of any other chassis, as were the 8-cwt. chassis. In order to get to some idea of the truth, I have to ask the question as to what extent did the Ford 15-cwt. 4 x 4 pilot chassis [see BLUEPRINT FOR VICTORY] owe anything to the MCC and Guy 4 x 4 15-cwt. Quads? Apart from similarity in basic concept is there anything to suggest that Fords could have adapted the pre-war MCC CS.8T design for instance? According to WHEELS & TRACKS 29 & 30 there was nothing in common at all with the MCC Q/QW!


*May I explain here that the WD often confused chassis types and capacities in their documentation, and this is my literal translation of the 1936 WD vehicle Specifications that all 1938-40 military trucks and lorries supposedly adhered to.

Last edited by David_Hayward (RIP); 10-01-05 at 12:19.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016