MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14-05-09, 16:51
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,069
Default

i take it that part of the sprocket faces in towards the hull ? and the second set of teeth will fit into the middle lugs on the tracks ?
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-05-09, 02:43
pzrwest's Avatar
pzrwest pzrwest is offline
Harold
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cardiff Ontario
Posts: 170
Default

Update:
Well the work continues, Here I have added the rear sprockets and gearboxes. The gearboxes are barely noticeable. I'll be adding extensions to the back side of the sprockets to give them the width. Here are the latest pics with the gearboxes and sprockets added to the hull



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-05-09, 01:13
pzrwest's Avatar
pzrwest pzrwest is offline
Harold
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cardiff Ontario
Posts: 170
Default

What is the clearance between the bottom of the carrier's hull and the ground on the real MkII carriers? Thank you in advance.... Harold
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-05-09, 02:59
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default

Harold, what a great job you are doing (although obsessive comes to mind). ;o)
__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-05-09, 04:05
pzrwest's Avatar
pzrwest pzrwest is offline
Harold
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cardiff Ontario
Posts: 170
Default

well not obsessive just trying to not have too much for the "nit pickers" to chew about... lol
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-05-09, 07:33
Ron Pier's Avatar
Ron Pier Ron Pier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Poole. UK
Posts: 1,273
Default

Just measured mine in the middle Harold. 11" so I guess you are looking for about 1.83" give or take. Ron
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-05-09, 14:10
pzrwest's Avatar
pzrwest pzrwest is offline
Harold
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cardiff Ontario
Posts: 170
Default

I did a google search on the specifications of the carriers and get several different clearance measurments from 8" to 11" what you posted Ron so maybe I should divide the difference and go with something in the middle. Here's one reference link I found if it's of any interest to anyone... http://www.wwiiequipment.com/index.p...iers&Itemid=55
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016