MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30-05-09, 15:23
huxley's Avatar
huxley huxley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 20
Default Similar...

Jim -

I checked on our local DOT site (Iowa.. truck is also in USA) regarding titling of such vehciles and it was a similar story. I had similar experience with my old Austin 10 Saloon (pitured in my avatar).

I got more info on the truck today. It is 158" WB (does this make a F60 then?), missing bed and front bumper. Body has some surface rust but nothing major. Engine is stuck, but transfer case, axles and tranny seem to be o.k.

But the size/length of the truck is worrying me now. I went that route in the past (1946 GMC 3-tonner) and the difference between trailering/towing such a vehicle and the smaller trucks to events is enormous. We eventually ended up with a 25 foot machine trailer with 1 ton truck (12K towing capaity) with a gooseneck/5th arrangement... none of which I have access to anymore.

Has anyone cut one of these trucks down? Or I suppose it would be sacriligious!?!

ATB -

H
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-05-09, 15:43
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huxley View Post
Jim -

Has anyone cut one of these trucks down? Or I suppose it would be sacriligious!?!

H
Lots of people have cut the frames on these. Then we crazy people buy them and fix them up again.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-05-09, 16:11
huxley's Avatar
huxley huxley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 20
Default Bubba factor?

I think in the Jeep community they call that the "bubba factor"...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-05-09, 17:25
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huxley View Post
I got more info on the truck today. It is 158" WB (does this make a F60 then?), missing bed and front bumper. Body has some surface rust but nothing major. Engine is stuck, but transfer case, axles and tranny seem to be o.k.

But the size/length of the truck is worrying me now. I went that route in the past (1946 GMC 3-tonner) and the difference between trailering/towing such a vehicle and the smaller trucks to events is enormous. We eventually ended up with a 25 foot machine trailer with 1 ton truck (12K towing capaity) with a gooseneck/5th arrangement... none of which I have access to anymore.

Has anyone cut one of these trucks down? Or I suppose it would be sacriligious!?!
H
The 158" WB does make it a F60, I'm quite sure there were initially plans for a LWB 30cwt, and almost equally sure they were never built.

Although the wheelbase is longer than other CMPs it isn't any longer than a modern pickup with extended cab (not crew cab) and long box.

I don't remember seeing it in the Ford maintenance manual (but it could be there) but there is a procedure listed in the Chevrolet repair manuals for splicing the frame. Basically the process is measure with care, cut at a 30 degree angle to horizontal for a longer splice and weld it solid. I don't remeber seeing any such repairs done on Chevrolet CMPs but I have seen Ford frames with nicely done welds in the frame just to the rear of the cab that look like they might have been done with this process. I have no idea if these Ford frames were factory built (to use smaller presses for the part length frame rails, or to allow one front section and different rear sections for different wheelbases to be joined) or field repaired but they all look to have been done by skilled welders, not some idiot who thinks more filler rod makes a better weld.

In the end, it's your truck and you can do as you want with it. If you do decide to shorten the wheelbase can I persuade you to stick with the original wheelbases of 134 or 101 inches? Sticking with the original wheelbases will let you either find or recreate "better" looking bodies. If you go with 134 inches, you shouldn't have to make up a new driveshaft, just remove the part between the transmission and the hanger bearing (at least this would be the case on a Chevrolet). If you want to go as short as 101 inches (again, it's your truck) there are several other differences to consider between the F15A that is the most common 101" and the F60 trucks. Axle ratios, size of the axle steering joints, tire size, single speed transfer case, frame cross section and maybe more. The easiest way to get to 101" WB would be to find a rolling F15A chassis and mix and match parts. For Chevrolet CMPs there seem to be many more 158 and 101 inch WB frames than 134 available, it is probably the same for Ford. Many people buy a "parts truck" and end up with a mix of the parts from both vehicles and parts from other sources. The front bumpers were standard rolled chanel section. Just measure one for size (likely 6", but get all dimensions so you get the right weight/shape 6" or whatever channel), measure and drill for the tow loops, frame mountings and brush guards.

I don't have as full a set of Ford manuals as Chevrolet, does anyone have spare parts manuals for F30, F60S or F60H they would like to sell me so that I can better answer these questions (and make reproductions available)?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-05-09, 18:47
huxley's Avatar
huxley huxley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 20
Default All good information!

Many thanks.

I would definitely keep with a stock length if I were cut the frame.

The 134 looking the most appealing right now because of what appears to be (at first glance anyway) a less complicated bed.

I could still use someone to volunteer to look at a few pics and give a informed opinion of this potential purchase... or perhaps I will just upload them from work on Monday.

Cheers!

H
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-05-09, 21:06
Jim Price's Avatar
Jim Price Jim Price is offline
'40 Ford F8, 4 x 2
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chandler, Arizona U.S.A.
Posts: 373
Default Ford Frames

Grant,
My F8' frame has the splices you speak of. When I queried MLU members on this the response was that it was a factory-done job.

Regards,
Jim

PS The pictures were of the frame before it was painted. It looks much better now!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Bowker View Post
I don't remeber seeing any such repairs done on Chevrolet CMPs but I have seen Ford frames with nicely done welds in the frame just to the rear of the cab that look like they might have been done with this process. I have no idea if these Ford frames were factory built (to use smaller presses for the part length frame rails, or to allow one front section and different rear sections for different wheelbases to be joined) or field repaired but they all look to have been done by skilled welders, not some idiot who thinks more filler rod makes a better weld.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MVC-120S.JPG (32.0 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpg MVC-121S.JPG (36.9 KB, 49 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-05-09, 21:53
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Thanks for the photo, this looks more like 45 degrees than the 30 (from horizontal) specified in the Chevrolet repair procedure, but does match the Ford frames I'm remembering. When I spoke of good welds, I meant "as good as a typical CMP factory weld", not like some of the post-war fixes. Strong and beautiful is good, gorilla welds are acceptable because they are strong, but some of the postwar repairs are neither strong nor beautiful.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-06-09, 15:31
huxley's Avatar
huxley huxley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 20
Default Pics of the truck...

I would appreciate any observations, comments, criticisms, suggestions... thanks!

The driver's side door and engine cover are included. Front bumper is missing.

Huxley
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC01586.JPG (67.7 KB, 94 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01587.JPG (57.4 KB, 91 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01588.JPG (66.3 KB, 86 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01589.JPG (63.2 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01590.JPG (58.1 KB, 98 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-06-09, 15:53
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default Looks like a good candidate for restoration

The bumper is no big deal, the brush bar in front of the grill will take more time to find or fabricate. Along with the D towing rings though there are more of the D rings around then number of good trucks. If this truck spent much of this life on this farm ask the farmer has a scrap pile amazing what has been found in some farm scrap piles.

Keep us posted.

Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-06-09, 17:23
huxley's Avatar
huxley huxley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 20
Default Beds?

Are original beds rare or generally available?

I know on WCs & CCKWs in the states most were cast off and other farm or industrial job-specific bodies added.

I seem to recall Rob Fast telling me that all the radio and ambulance boxes ended up as chicken coops!

H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016