MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 22-06-09, 00:27
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Webb View Post
Oddly even though there is a chassis serial the engine number which was originally stamped on the engine, gearbox and chassis rail was used as the chassis number.
Keith, that should read: "....the engine number which was originally stamped on the engine, gearbox or chassis rail was used as the chassis number".

Ford avoided stamping the Engine Number on the engine block to ALLOW swapping in of factory reconditioned engines which were held in stock and available through local Ford dealerships, thus necessitating no alteration of paperwork for the vehicle. So as not to "Dupe" unsuspecting buyers, factory reconditioned engines were identified by a serialled data plate giving under and oversizes for the rebuild, but the nominal "Engine Number" (aka Chassis number) remained the same for the vehicle.

The pics below also show that the notion of a "1943 60cwt" can be quite elastic. 4G5678F is a 1943 number assembled in '44. 3G31287F is a 1942 number assembled in '45.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0373.JPG (98.0 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0372.JPG (78.8 KB, 22 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!

Last edited by Tony Smith; 22-06-09 at 00:37.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:24.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016