![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think changing the length on the 75mm barrel would have increased muzzle velocity, but this probably increases chamber pressure too, so tests and calculations would have had to be made to see if the breech block, chamber, recoil mechanism, mounting, etc. could stand this. I guess the priority at the time was developing the new 76mm design which was suppose to be the answer to equalizing things. The 76mm with HVAP(hyper velocity armor piercing) ammo,scarce at the time, cold perform about the same as the Panther 75mm.The M18 tank destroyers had this and the Sherman 76mm crews would try and trade for a round or two of this for emergencies, I read that in the book "M4 Sherman".
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Increasing the barrel length of the 75mm gun, without changing the ammunition, would only yield a small increase in performance.
75mm M2 Barrel length (length of tube): 84in Muzzle velocity: 1,860fps Armour Penetration: 60mm at 500 yards/30deg. British 75mm Mk V Length of tube 107.8in MV: 2,030fps AP: 68mm @500yards/30deg 75mm M3 Length of tube 110.625in MV: 2,300fps AP: 70mm @500yds/30deg 6pdr Mk III Length of tube: 96.2in MV: 2,800fps AP: 81mm 6pdr Mk V Length of tube: 112.2in MV: 2,965fps AP: 83mm @500yards/30deg |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|