![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Don't be misled by the majority of online references for Flathead Engines, as most only refer to US production and often state that production ceased altogether between '42 and '45. Canadian made engines continued production throughout and remained Green in both 221 and 239 sizes. US production used both Green, Blue or Black, while Dagenham used Green or Black. Last edited by Local Chap; 09-11-10 at 01:11. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Like I said, wartime manuals and parts lists are not too reliable!
When did Dagenham flirt with Black during wartime? I've seen original 1946 and 1947 Dagenham flatheads with US electricals both were ford dark green. A 42/43 UC Dagenham flathead sump in unrestored condition was also ford dark green as well as a 1942 7V Flathead in original condition.... I wasn't really thinking about Canadian production as I have no details about any Canadian production specs other than they seem to follow Detroit. For instance the parts lists say the Detroit Conrods are the same part as Canadian but NOT Dagenham as we had a design freeze in 1938, thus didn't pick-up the 1938 24 stud upgrade. Are we saying that Ford Canada produced 3.6L and 3.8L side by side just as they did in Detroit? If so, that's good as it backs up the wartime information that Ford didn't like continuing 3.6L production and only did so as the UK forced them to. Ford offered the Merc to replace the 85BHP Ford 3.6L but we said no. The 1941 Loyd manual sates 85BHP and the manual is widely a cut and paste job from an earlier UC publication. I've got all the Loyd parts lists updates from November 1944 until 1950 which also fully covers the UC power unit too, none of the list updates mention engine changes, which suggests the 85BHP stayed with the British UC throughout wartime. What do the Canadian Produced UC parts lists say?
__________________
Alastair Lincoln, UK. Under Restoration: 1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing 1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry The Loyd on Facebook Last edited by ajmac; 09-11-10 at 03:48. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
So basicly you can fit any size engine, in an colour of the rainbow and it doesn't make a blind bit of difference?
Tehehehehehe....
__________________
1967 Land Rover Plant Repair Vehicle 1941 Matchless G3L 194? Wiles Junior Trailer 1941 Morris Commercial CS8 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's about the size of it!
![]() Mine is going green along with the gearbox as I found original dark green paint hidden under the oil and grime on the Loyds. Also of interest is the ford supplied parts which Loyd used, every part of the Loyd has a pea green primer and OD top coat, however the prop cover, torque tube and I THINK the axle all have a red oxide primer and OD topcoat. I'm not sure about the bogies yet as they haven't given me one spot of paint, far too much rust for that! The Flathead from the Loyd is proving a bu#ger to strip down due to the range damage, however evidence suggests that it is wartime production. 24 stud, which gives us post 1939. Two bolt front cover, which gives us post 1942 and no cast numbers on the bell housing which means not post 46 production. 1942 - 1946. Does anyone know how I can ID it as Canadian manufactured?
__________________
Alastair Lincoln, UK. Under Restoration: 1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing 1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry The Loyd on Facebook |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
is there a cast number above the water pump, or any stampings on the inlet manifold face of the block?
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK, well as predicted this will run and run. So basically, you have a choice, and I have chosen Ford Blue! Why, because I like it. The black is very smart but wont give the definition between the flat black of the Dynamo, starter, carburettor body etc. So blue it is. I hesitate to post this photo for fear of being told it is wrong, but please remember it is still wet when I took the photo and of course it is a photo so not necessarily an accurate depiction. It is however, Ford engine blue from US paint manaufacturer POR. It will look very smart I hope. Not disimilar to David Gordon engine colour either and very close to the NOS inlet manifold I bought, pre fading.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes it does go on. I have just re visited the Vanpelt site (American)again.
It states, about colours, that Ford and Merc engines, through 1940 to 1942 were dark green. Then it said Merc engines were dark blue from 1941 to 1948.(one contradicts the other) Post war Fords were blue, and that truck engine paint colours generally were the same as car engines. I imagine in the U.K. that at times there were issues with supply of paint pigments, along with every thing else, and that the power unit colours were not always one colour. I guess if one is really embarassed about the colour, then they could always leave the engine covers on ![]() Ps. From a mechanics point of veiw,black is the worst possible colour because you cannot see anything. Its just a black hole, and you cant see any faults. Yellow is great! but for a carrier Blue or Green is bang on!
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... Last edited by Lynn Eades; 10-11-10 at 21:35. Reason: because I can. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks!! I feel somewhat better after that. Now all I want is the paint to cure, and as the temperature in my workshop has now fallen to 3 degrees I may be waiting until Spring for it to go off!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|