MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Gun Park

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-11-10, 22:53
horsa's Avatar
horsa horsa is offline
David Gordon
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lorena, Texas, USA
Posts: 619
Default

I guess Mule tires would fit the rims based on the measurements. Think they stand up slightly higher from checking specs on one of the mule sites. What I'm still searching around for is an ATV or small tractor type tire with the solid chevron lugs. Several look similar to the originals but the better looking patterns don't seem to be available in the 8" width with 10" rim.

Has anyone out there successfully used Mule tires or other agricultural patterns on a 6-pdr rim?

For the towed mortar, they first used the same wheel and 16" tire found on the airborne trailers. I've torn my wheel hubs down to see if it was adapted for the 6-prd rim but they apparently used a new hub when they switched the tire patterns out and adopted the 6-pdr rim sometime in 1945 so that kills the option of going back to an airborne rim and tire for lack of functional hubs that will interchange.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mortar-Gun-Tires3.jpg (57.1 KB, 35 views)
__________________
David Gordon - MVPA # 15292
'41 Willys MB British Airborne Jeep
'42 Excelsior Welbike Mark I
'42 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'43 BSA Folding Military Bicycle
'43 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'44 Orme-Evans Airborne Trailer No. 1 Mk. II
'44 Airborne 100-Gallon Water Bowser Trailer
'44 Ford T-16 Universal Carrier
'44 Jowett Cars 4.2-Inch Towed Mortar
'44 Daimler Scout Car Mark II
'45 Studebaker M29C Weasel

Last edited by horsa; 22-11-10 at 02:59.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-11-10, 01:44
David DeWeese David DeWeese is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 357
Default tires...

Hi,
Don't know if this is any help, but Carlisle makes a 7.50-10 that is fairly rugged. Sidewall shows "Industrial All Purpose, tube type, load range E".
They are 8-ply tread and 4-ply sidewall and are highway rated for 1700 lbs each IIRC.
I use these on my ATV trailer....bought locally.
Thanks, David
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCF0198.jpg (55.9 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF0199.jpg (74.7 KB, 38 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-11-10, 16:46
horsa's Avatar
horsa horsa is offline
David Gordon
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lorena, Texas, USA
Posts: 619
Default

Appreicate the lead and shots of what the Carlisle tires look like. I'm still holding out a bit for a wartime military or implement tread but I know they used a lot of civilian road tires as well. Not many options for the small and wide sizes.
__________________
David Gordon - MVPA # 15292
'41 Willys MB British Airborne Jeep
'42 Excelsior Welbike Mark I
'42 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'43 BSA Folding Military Bicycle
'43 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'44 Orme-Evans Airborne Trailer No. 1 Mk. II
'44 Airborne 100-Gallon Water Bowser Trailer
'44 Ford T-16 Universal Carrier
'44 Jowett Cars 4.2-Inch Towed Mortar
'44 Daimler Scout Car Mark II
'45 Studebaker M29C Weasel
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-11-10, 02:28
Gunner Gunner is offline
T' Guns thank God t' guns
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 777
Default 6 Pr tyres

Hi Dave:

I have the same headache with my 6 Pr. Aircraft tyres are actually what the originals were based on! I have been using mule tyres for several years and have gotten a lot of milage out of them... I'm going to order two new ones in the spring to do a tyre swap... the old ones are starting to show canvas after 12 years!

I recently found a homemade trailer using a 6 Pr axle. It had a 6 Pr tyre on one side and an aircraft tyre on the other. The 6 Pr tyre popped when 30 PSI was added... too bad as it had lots of tread on it but clearly no sidewall strength left.

I may see if I can find used 8.50x10 aircraft tyres. I know that they have to replace them after so many cycles even if they still look good.

Cheers! Mike
__________________
Mike Calnan
Ubique!
("Everywhere", the sole Battle Honour of the Royal Regiment of Canadian Artillery)
www.calnan.com/swords
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-11-10, 04:32
horsa's Avatar
horsa horsa is offline
David Gordon
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lorena, Texas, USA
Posts: 619
Default

Used would be the way to go with aircraft tires since they are 10 ply and would still last a long time with something lightweight that was towed. But like the U.S. NDT patterns, they just don't seem right to me.

Attached is a shot of an off-road forklift tire I'm considering. It's for a 10" rim and the section width is 7.9 so would be pretty close to the wartime lugged tires. Less than half an inch off in expanded width so not all that apparent. And while they are also not correct, they project a closer look and feel to the heavy wartime tread I think. Cost is comparable to the modern civilian trailer tires. The inner rim width of the 6-pdr/towed mortar is 5 inches and these have a recommended inner rim size of 5.5 inches. They make another with the same tread for a true 5 inch inner rim size but the section width is 7 inches which is 1 1/4 inches narrower than the wartime tire. I'm told either would fit with no issues though.

Down side is it isn't a highway tire. Max hardtop speed is only about 30mph. Not sure if it becomes unstable at higher speeds or if it will fall apart. But I can't see pulling artillery down the highway at cruising speed myself so don't consider it an issue.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ind-deeplug-L.jpg (6.9 KB, 104 views)
__________________
David Gordon - MVPA # 15292
'41 Willys MB British Airborne Jeep
'42 Excelsior Welbike Mark I
'42 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'43 BSA Folding Military Bicycle
'43 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'44 Orme-Evans Airborne Trailer No. 1 Mk. II
'44 Airborne 100-Gallon Water Bowser Trailer
'44 Ford T-16 Universal Carrier
'44 Jowett Cars 4.2-Inch Towed Mortar
'44 Daimler Scout Car Mark II
'45 Studebaker M29C Weasel
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-11-10, 06:17
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

I don't think the problem is stability but rather heat buildup causing disintegration. The flexing of the tire as it rolls causes heat. If the heat builds faster than it can dissipate the tire will eventually fail. To reduce the total heat buildup there are choices; reduce the speed (fewer revs/cycles per minute but still a minute to dissipate the heat), reduce the load (less flex per rev/cycle), increase inflation pressure (within limits) to reduce flex, reduce the distance (so heat never reaches the dangerous level) between cooloffs. The tradeoffs between load, speed and distance are well understood in the heavy construction equipment field but apply equally to the highway transport field. Tire makers publish load/inflation tables to describe the allowable load for highway tires at various pressures (they assume we won't actually change speed for any length of time on the highwayso they don't publish for that variable).
The need to get rid of heat also is at least part of the reason tires are lower rated in dual applications than single. With less airflow around the tire it doesn't cool as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-11-10, 16:45
horsa's Avatar
horsa horsa is offline
David Gordon
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lorena, Texas, USA
Posts: 619
Default

Sounds like the implement type tire would work out fine then for my application. I'd trailer the load anyway if I needed to take it more than 10-15 miles.
__________________
David Gordon - MVPA # 15292
'41 Willys MB British Airborne Jeep
'42 Excelsior Welbike Mark I
'42 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'43 BSA Folding Military Bicycle
'43 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'44 Orme-Evans Airborne Trailer No. 1 Mk. II
'44 Airborne 100-Gallon Water Bowser Trailer
'44 Ford T-16 Universal Carrier
'44 Jowett Cars 4.2-Inch Towed Mortar
'44 Daimler Scout Car Mark II
'45 Studebaker M29C Weasel
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016