![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
RHC Why is it that when you have the $$, you don't have the time, and when you have the time you don't have the $$? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
...man that would be nice parked next to the barn..... we could drive to the East Coast and raid every CMP in one Summer.....
We should be able to borrow it..... shit we are already paying for it.... Bob
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B C15a Cab 11 Hammond, Ontario Canada |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It looks very nice, but it would be no good here. It looks like you'd need a small continent to turn it around
![]()
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes Lynn You have that one right, I have a civilian version(much smaller) and the biggest problem with these trucks is the turning radius. It stinks but the remainder of the truck is very nice. Gilles
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It does look a nice truck, and I imagine very suited to the vast Canadian highways.
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Can someone who knows better enlighten me a little here?
I would question the feasability of these new tactical vehs in service. Larger is not better especially with regards to congested urban environs, narrow foreign roads and highways, swamps, deserts, jungles, mountain ranges etc. When the US decided to scrap the infamous jeep for the HMMVW they found out very quickly that the nimble quality of the jeep was lost forever. I would suppose that todays military opts for protective and load handling qualitites over those that were imparted by the jeep? Of course I am not comparing a 10 ton truck to that of a lightweight mv but it seems that the days of small tactical vehicles are dwindling...
__________________
3RD Echelon Wksp 1968 M274A5 Mule Baifield USMC 1966 M274A2 Mule BMY USMC 1966 M274A2 Mule BMY USMC 1958 M274 Mule Willys US Army 1970 M38A1 CDN3 70-08715 1 CSR 1981 MANAC 3/4T CDN trailer 1943 Converto Airborne Trailer 1983 M1009 CUCV 1957 Triumph TRW 500cc RT-524, PRC-77s, and trucks and stuff and more stuff and and....... OMVA, MVPA, G503, Steel Soldiers |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The military mind set is if something makes sense do a 180 from it. Least thats what I've seen in my sort few years in so far.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The size of this vehicle may raise some eyebrows, but this truck takes as much space to turn around as the MLVW - better turning radius and other improvements help in this regard. Some of the in theatre trucks are bigger than this beast, so route planning and recces become extremely important. In any case, this is but one of the many vehicles being pursued by the army. The other vehicles will be true tactical vehicles that offer the levels of protection required on operations. I for one am very happy that the gunners have finally gotten a vehicle that offers some comforts (read heat) to the detachment.
__________________
RHC Why is it that when you have the $$, you don't have the time, and when you have the time you don't have the $$? |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|