I don't disagree with any of you that it would be much better if there were an accurate photo of what is being sold. Even no photo would be better to my senses than a photo of what the item could be turned into with some/copius work.
All I'm saying is that in this case they want to sell something, describe it (hopefully accurately) and do say that the photo is not the item being sold. It can be misleading if the buyer doesn't read carefully, but is not fraud because it is stated the two items are not one. I wouldn't buy based only on their description, particularly with the misleading potential of the photo, but that's my choice to make.
I originally posted the link so that if anyone was interested on the terms given they could investigate further to find out if the carrier met their needs/interests.
|
05-02-11, 23:55
Threaded Mode