|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Interesting carrier conversion ?? 
			
			One of my more interesting trips. hope you like the pics  Regards Ron 
				__________________ Ron Winfer | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Carrier 
			
			Converted to what use though? Was there enough left to find a hull number? 
				__________________ Film maker 42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains 42 FGT No9 (Aust) 42 F15 Keith Webb Macleod, Victoria Australia Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Not converted to what, but why?  Two sets of roadwheels and no idler.
		 
				__________________ Terry Warner - 74-????? M151A2 - 70-08876 M38A1 - 53-71233 M100CDN trailer Beware! The Green Disease walks among us! | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			may sound stupid but in this config would the carrier rock less when coming on and off power..if so this may have a bearing on why they have done what they have done ?
		 
				__________________ is mos redintegro __5th Div___46th Div__ 1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI* Lower Hull No. 10131 War Department CT54508 (SOLD) 1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration). 1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration). | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Interesting carrier conversion ?? 
			
			Seems by the number of PM messages there is quite a lot of interest in this machine firstly it was converted by two brothers just after the war to use in a saw mill, to haul logs, the standard carrier would not do the job that they wanted to do, it was converted to a skid steer machine by using the drive line from a Marmon Herringto two man tank, as we all know this drive line is about as scarce as rocking horse s..t this information was told to me by a son of one of the brothers, I am still trying to track down the rest of the tank, who knows it may still be out there in the bush,its very thick in this area, anyway here are a few pics for anyones interest, No Keith there were no numbers on this machine as you can see the rear end was removed to fit the Marmon conversion,also the wheels are the narrow pattern, well I hope this is of some interest, Regards Ron, PS it was fitted with British track.
		 
				__________________ Ron Winfer | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Been having a bit of trouble uploading the pics will have to post them at a later date.  maybe it will work this time ? Regards Ron 
				__________________ Ron Winfer | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Dogon 
			
			more pics of the carrier
		 
				__________________ Ron Winfer | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Interesting Conversion 
			
			Sorry guys, I have had a hell of a time with this computer today, these pics are supposed to be on the thread   Interesting carrier conversion, all the same I hope that you find them of some interest Regards Ron
		 
				__________________ Ron Winfer | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Computer trouble 
			
			What sort of a carrier is this one Ron?   
				__________________ Film maker 42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains 42 FGT No9 (Aust) 42 F15 Keith Webb Macleod, Victoria Australia Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern Last edited by Hanno Spoelstra; 22-02-11 at 15:58. Reason: link fixed, please use www.mapleleafup.org | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 I've put your pictures in the right thread, this is the same carrier conversion we saw before isn't it? Hanno 
				__________________ Regards, Hanno -------------------------- | 
| 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Interesting carrier conversion 
			
			keith, THAT'S a FLEA carrier !! Don't mess with him .Lot's of heavey armor and a mean bite
		 
				__________________ George is hooked on OD 5 window DT969 8 ton Fruehauf trailer M2A1Halftrack ,CMP #11 F15A1 #13 F15A1 RAF Fordson Tractor, 42 WLC HD No.2MK11 CT267514 center CB24713 bottom hull25701 ,No.2 MK2 parts MK1 10128 ,(2) MK1 ,Parts Hull9305 .Hull 10407 Hull plate # 7250 all have walk plate on back steps 1917 Patent modle amphibious army tank Last edited by George McKenzie; 23-02-11 at 21:29. | 
| 
			 
			#12  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Of course! 
			
			I should have recognised this instantly. Hope it's not a rabies carrier too.     (incidentally it's "e" before "i" in Keith). 
				__________________ Film maker 42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains 42 FGT No9 (Aust) 42 F15 Keith Webb Macleod, Victoria Australia Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern | 
| 
			 
			#13  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Intereting carrier conversions 
			
			I was lookin at a driver  carrier that was a MK1 .It was painted black  .Not repainted. What made it interesting was that it had the Loyd steering system in it ,Two leavers in the center . It could have been a proto type ..Lower hull 12670,center# CB12669 , I'll have to go back and do more research on it as it is in storage now .George
		 
				__________________ George is hooked on OD 5 window DT969 8 ton Fruehauf trailer M2A1Halftrack ,CMP #11 F15A1 #13 F15A1 RAF Fordson Tractor, 42 WLC HD No.2MK11 CT267514 center CB24713 bottom hull25701 ,No.2 MK2 parts MK1 10128 ,(2) MK1 ,Parts Hull9305 .Hull 10407 Hull plate # 7250 all have walk plate on back steps 1917 Patent modle amphibious army tank | 
| 
			 
			#14  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Sorted out 
			
			Thanks Hanno, for sorting the pics out for me, yes it is the same carrier, thanks again Regards Ron
		 
				__________________ Ron Winfer | 
| 
			 
			#15  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Marmon Herrington 
			
			I don't know if this has any relevance Ron but the three replica Japanese tanks that were built for use in filming The Pacific TV series ended up being fitted with Marmon Herrington transmissions after the original set up using a Jaguar diff/rear axle turned out a failure. I have no knowledge of where they were procured but was told that they had come from a batch of light tanks that were on their way to the Dutch East Indies when war broke out and the ship was redirected to Australia. For some reason these tanks were not put into service but broken up. I seem to remember being told that this was done by Ford in Geelong. John Belfield seemed to be quite familiar with the story and it may well be that this is common knowledge amongst the armour enthusiasts but I'd never previously heard of it. It struck me as strange that these vehicles would have been broken up at such a desperate time. It also seems strange that there are any remnants still about. I would be curious to know more. Corowa is almost here I might ask around. David 
				__________________ Hell no! I'm not that old! | 
| 
			 
			#16  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Article on Aussie Marmon Herrington Tanks 
			
			G'day Motto, and everyone, the armour historian at Puckapunyal, Major Paul Handel, has done research on these very interesting small tanks in Australia and wrote an article about them. It even has a number of photos. See link below:- http://anzacsteel.hobbyvista.com/Arm...ingtinph_1.htm I have heard a number of times that there are NOS transmissions and final drives extant in Victoria, and the ones used in the replica Japanese tanks could have came from the same source. Looking at the images, I would not like to have been going to battle in one. Something bigger, heavier and faster would be preferable. Jared | 
| 
			 
			#17  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  30 mph!! 
			
			Whoops!, I'll take back one of my statements in the last post. I didn't re-read the article before posting:- 30mph is fast for any early armour, Jared | 
| 
			 
			#18  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Hi Jared & Motto, John Belfield was here a few months back and I showed him the Marmon Herrington parts that I have, and he said the ones used in the movie that was made here were not the same as the two man type that I have, I dont know what they were but they are not the same, he said that these were the first of there type that he had seen,and according to the son of the man who built the conversion,he was told by his father and uncle that they were from a two man tank that came back from the Dutch east indies, Regards Ron 
				__________________ Ron Winfer | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |