MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > Post-war Military Vehicles

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 22-05-11, 00:32
Richard Coutts-Smith Richard Coutts-Smith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Barnawartha, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,236
Default

The Aussy one appears to be the same as FV228288. see attached.
Spare book shows castings for chassis no. 20 000 and above, where does that put the Aussy chassis at 13 000 + 14000?
Can't quite believe the differences in one casting for a short production run of vehicles. I assume these would have been ripped off, when the armoured bodies where fitted, as the inherent design flaw would have been quite obvious by that time. Which would also mean that you should have bucket loads of these castings lying around over there.
Maybe one of the designers had shares in a casting plant?
Obviously the longer legs on the "Y" are able to absorb the manifold movement.
That is the first uncraked short "Y" I have seen.

Not sure if your gasket fitting hammer is quite large enough.
Rich.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Humber exhaust 005.jpg (60.2 KB, 25 views)
__________________
C60S
Austin Champ x 2
Humber 1 Ton & Trailer
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016