MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > Post-war Military Vehicles

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 22-05-11, 12:18
Richard Coutts-Smith Richard Coutts-Smith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Barnawartha, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,237
Default

"Rich I think it is because supporting the heat shield from the two manifolds meant there had to be two different components, a forward one & a rear one.

Supporting the heat shield independently meant one manifold could be used in either position. Another factor might have been the difficulty of removing the retaining stud if it had become too encrusted with the effects of heat, rust & time."

Sounds logical to me Clive, but I notice that the engine with the cast Heat Shield mounts is later than the one without (11347). How was the shield mounted without the manifold casting? I do not have one on the Humber, and I assume that the one pictured is bent, and should be flat.
Rich.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Humber heat sheild.jpg (65.4 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg Humber heat sheild (1).jpg (50.3 KB, 17 views)
__________________
C60S
Austin Champ x 2
Humber 1 Ton & Trailer
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016