MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-12, 20:43
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Waterman View Post
Wasn't there an electric fuel pump that was used in some of the Ford CMPs to help cure some fuel supply and vapor lock problems?
Yes, the Autopulse, it was standard on Indian Army CMPs. Read more here on its purpose and operation.

Hanno
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-06-12, 23:46
horsa's Avatar
horsa horsa is offline
David Gordon
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lorena, Texas, USA
Posts: 619
Default

I'd also done a lot of research into the use of electric fuel pumps on military vehicles during the war as a fix to operational problems in hot regions prior to going that route on my own T-16.

The modern pump I ended up using is rated for 4-7psi but this is restricted by the adjustable fuel pressure regulator that I have set at 3.5psi since the wartime manuals mention that pressure in association with the carburator.

Not sure how this equates to actual fuel flow since that would entail math formulas dealing with the pressure and capacity of the fuel lines
__________________
David Gordon - MVPA # 15292
'41 Willys MB British Airborne Jeep
'42 Excelsior Welbike Mark I
'42 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'43 BSA Folding Military Bicycle
'43 BSA M20 Motorcycle
'44 Orme-Evans Airborne Trailer No. 1 Mk. II
'44 Airborne 100-Gallon Water Bowser Trailer
'44 Ford T-16 Universal Carrier
'44 Jowett Cars 4.2-Inch Towed Mortar
'44 Daimler Scout Car Mark II
'45 Studebaker M29C Weasel
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-12, 00:25
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Andrew

If I recall, the 94 and 97 stromberg carbs are delivered fuel at 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 psi. any more and the carb will flood. This pressure is achieved solely by the spring under the diaphragm in the mechanical pump.
If the carb is flooding from the electric pump when the engine is stopped, why wouldnt it be flooding, when its running (and vibribation is also happening)
There are three things here. delivery pressure, suction (the ability of the pump to lift the fuel to the pump measured in inches of mercury or the metric equivalent) and lastly the delivery volume.
It sounds to me, that you have too much pressure and not enough volume.
If you put a test gauge on your delivery pipe to the carb you can check the delivery pressure directly. If it is too high that will cause your carb to flood, and that can be a little tricky for even the mechanics among us to diagnose. (we can often wrongly decide its starving) Many of the electric pumps will deliver a hansome pressure. I saw one advertised recently at 8 1/2 psi. (Alfa Romeo used to have an adjustable pressure regulator called a "Fisba" for the carbs (Delorto, Webber, Solex)
My gut feeling is that you might have an air leak into the lines somewhere, between the pick up(s), and the pump suction side. these can be difficult to find. One of the prime possibilities will be the fuel change over valve (assuming you have one)
The best way to check this is run a temporary line (reservoir included) to the pump, and see how she goes.
If that fixes it, re introduce what ever sections you can, until you find the leak.
You could use a vacuum gauge on the suction side of the pump. Get a reading, and see if its the same at your fuel pick up pipes at the tank(s)
On the vapour lock, The original lines were steel not copper. This might help to slow the rate of heat transfer. Making up the pipes with the risk of vapour lock accuring in mind, might help.I have seen some really bad results.
Lastly, I would check that you have no blockages any where in the lines. I know a lot of it is new, but it is amazing where swarf, solder, thread tape, silicon, and every other type of gunge can get to, in a new system.
Hope this helps when your lost for ideas.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 04-06-12 at 08:45.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-12, 06:46
cletrac (RIP)'s Avatar
cletrac (RIP) cletrac (RIP) is offline
David Pope
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eston, Sask, Canada
Posts: 2,249
Default

I've used electric pumps on daily driver vehicles and have found that you need to use a pressure regulator with a return line. If you use a dead head regulator then the pump will burn itself out in no time because it's putting out all the pressure it can all the time. With the return line the pump just makes whatever pressure you've got the regulator set at. A bonus with the return line is you totally eliminate vapour locking problems. Any vapour that forms is sent back to the tank in the return line. Also with the fuel circulating all the time you end up with cooler gas getting to the carb which helps with lots of problems. Any more I use a tank pump off a throttle body injection system since they last forever when just putting out 5 psi or so.
__________________
1940 Cab 11 C8 Wireless with 1A2 box & 11 set
1940 Cab 11 C8 cab and chassis
1940 Cab 11 C15 with 2A1 & Motley mount & Lewis gun
1940 Cab 11 F15A w/ Chev rear ends
1941 Cab 12 F15A
1942-44 Cab 13 F15A x 5
1942 cab 13 F15A with 2B1 box
1943 cab 13 F15A with 2H1 box
1943 Cab 13 C8A HUP
1944 Cab 13 C15A with 2C1 box
1943 Cletrac M2 High Speed Tractor
MkII Bren gun carrier chassis x 2
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-12, 10:36
andrew honychurch andrew honychurch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kent, Great Britain
Posts: 362
Default

Wow, some great in put here thanks Guys. David, as you know I have pretty much copied your set up with the electric pump for all the reasons I highlighted above, and a pressure regulator with filter. Previous to getting the tanks resinstalled and making up new fuel pipes, I was running it on a Jerry Can with a small electric pump on the top. Made as a "get me home for the DUKW, if I got fuel pump/tank/line problems whilst at sea. I didnt fancy gradually sinking as I tried to get to grips with where the problem lay, sorry I digress. On the Jerry can the Carrier ran well with no overfueling problems but it did feel odd at higher revs. Almost as thoughyou had to keep accelerating to maintain steady engine revs. I did wonder whether the main jet was blocked and it was only working on the power jet and accelerator jet, but since it is a brand new Carb and really perfect, I dont think it is that. This led me to think that the electric pump on the Jerry can was perhaps not producing the flow necessary and therefore after accelerating there was a momentary loss of fuel requiring a few miliseconds to recharge.

Anyway, without getting to the bottom of that problem I have now fitting all new, copper, fuel line, new original specification "junior" fuel filter and as already mentioned the electric "facet" and fuel regulator. I too , have set this at 3.5 psi.

If the pump is left on for too long without starting the engine, it will overcome the carburettor float valve and flood. It may well be that the engine was designed to receive fuel at this pressure but of course the advantage of a mechanical pump is that it will not pump unless the engine is turning over, unlike the electric one.

I do worry that I may have too much head for the pump to manage to keep up with when the engine is running. In other words, yes it will flood when the engine is not turning over, but MAYBE as the pump and filterking are mounted high up it cannot keep up when engine is running? I have mounted the pump about the same height as the carburettor which is about 3 feet above the bottom of the fuel tank, which in turn is about six inches higher than the original fuel pump.

On the fuel return pipes, I fully get the advantage of returning unspent fuel to the tank, and have long been told that this will help remove the vapour locks back to the tank. However, since there is no obvious way to achive this without creating new pipes into the two fuel tanks ( or just one I suppose) I have left this alone. The Filter King advertises that it is able to negate the effects of vapourisation in its design.

http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/perfor...tor-and-filter

I am sure I am somewhere near achieving correct running but as Lynn says, it could be as simple as a vacuum leak somewhere or even a fault with the Governor. More digging is needed, and its stopped raining here in Kent, so I am off to play now. thanks chaps
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-06-12, 13:43
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Andrew

Is your pump too high in relation to the tank?
Some pumps are good at pushing , but not lifting.
BTW Jerry cans are notorious for flaking paint on the inside.
Don't let it flood. It will bore wash the lube from the rings in your new motor.
just more thoughts.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-06-12, 14:40
andrew honychurch andrew honychurch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kent, Great Britain
Posts: 362
Thumbs up

Hi Lynn, the pump is about 0.2 metres above the bottom of the fuel tank, and looking at the Facet cylinder pump data, they will work at 0.3m so I think I am ok as far as that is concerned.

Anyway, I have just taken it out for a couple of miles across country. BLOOMIN FANTASTIC. she ran really well, and the electric pump and regulator seems, as David Gordon agreed, to have ironed out the idling and smooths out the performance. Not discernable flat spots and its getting better and better. Really pleased. The only bad news is its tracks have now got muddy!!

I am going to try to get one of my daughters to do a proper video in the next few days and I will get it posted up to YouTube. I think that the fuel problems may be solved thanks to me having a couple of lose fittings on the new pipes. As many are double flared fittings, they needed to bed down and then get another pinch on the pipe nuts. Fingers crossed. I defintely think it is not doing more than 3 or 4 mpg though! What a fun way to convert cash into hot gases though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-06-12, 16:43
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default One comment on electric pumps and ethanol

One more comment on electric pumps and ethanol I would add. I have had problems with electric pumps seizing or working poorly once they have had ethanol gas run through them and then have been allowed to stand open to the air dry.

Discovered this on test stand running in engines once used if the fuel pump was allowed to stand dry they failed. Had two of them do this in a row fortunately this happened both times with in a month of buying the pump and the auto parts store took them back. Now when I disconnect an pump from the engine or from the tank I make sure that the line and pump stay full of gas.

Just a thought.

Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016