MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-13, 22:42
Jacques Reed Jacques Reed is offline
VMVC
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 864
Default Diff housing rod?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Private_collector View Post
Look at the area just left of the diff housing. You can just see the brake line 'T' connector. What I want to know is what the hell is that long flat rod sticking out from it??? It is attached by the same bolt that holds the 'T' to the diff housing, and I have NO idea what, if anything, it is there for. Any ideas? If it's not supposed to be there, I would love to remove the bloody thing, as it poses a safety hazard to my shins and ankles.
Tony,

I'd say it is just a add-on by someone to try to keep the steering ends from turning.

Maybe the diff was off a home made crane setup using two front ends as was sometimes done. That rod would help to keep the wheels in the straight ahead position if the owner found he didn't want to look after two steering wheels while using the crane.

Turf it- it's not required or original!

Cheers,
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff

Jacques Reed
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-13, 02:33
Private_collector's Avatar
Private_collector Private_collector is offline
Tony Baker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wide Bay, QLD, Australia.
Posts: 1,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacques Reed View Post

Turf it- it's not required or original!
Good, consider it gone!

Thanks,
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still)
Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-13, 10:10
Private_collector's Avatar
Private_collector Private_collector is offline
Tony Baker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wide Bay, QLD, Australia.
Posts: 1,819
Default Steering tie rod is now off axle assembly

It's off! The damn thing came away just as Jacques said. First couple of beltings did nothing on passenger side, so I started clouting the driver side, and it just fell out. No fuss, no swearing. Went back to passenger side, and another whack got it out too.

Also went to the sandblasters and retrieved the pintle spring, bumper brackets, pintle hook thingy and the backing plate that it bolts to. These will get painted Saturday, then fit to place Sunday.

Rear axle U bolts not yet had threads re-cut, but i'm sure they will get around to it soon...ish. A quick measure shows the threads will need to be cut another 50mm to fit my rear spring bundles (ones without the HD spring set).

$(KGrHqRHJE8FESjb10eWBRGLMSWrSQ~~60_3.jpg
Now a slightly diffferent tac. I have noticed most Ford front bumpers (as above) are attached by one bracket on driver side, and a Y bracket on passenger. I have a second bracket on the Organ Donor that goes on driver side. Looks to be original, and goes on the inner side of chassis behind the steering box bracket. I meant to get it off and photograph it last weekend, but just forgot.
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still)
Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-13, 14:59
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default RH bumper bracket assy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Private_collector View Post
I have a second bracket on the Organ Donor that goes on driver side. Looks to be original, and goes on the inner side of chassis behind the steering box bracket.

It's definitely original Tony, but for some reason it wasn't always fitted. It seems to have been omitted from many early production Fords, including several of my own 1942 trucks. There's no question of them having been removed subsequently, as the chassis bolts are too short to allow fitment in the first place. However in every case the main RH bracket is drilled to accommodate the second bracket, which leads me to wonder if it was a design change, followed by a delay in supply of the new part.

Interestingly it's present on my two FGT chassis, which would also have been 1942 production. This leads me to wonder if it was initially designed for winch trucks, ie. to brace the bumper against sideways displacement caused by cable force through the front rollers. Perhaps this was found to be a problem when winching sideways.

I happen to have a particular interest in bumper brackets, stemming from an incident 40 years ago in my first blitz. I'm sure Keith will recall the altercation with a tree that left the bumper bar rubbing on the RH tyre during turns. This was the result of an incomplete RH bumper assy - one of the many parts missing off this blitz when it was rushed into service!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg TONY5112 - Copy.jpg (43.3 KB, 25 views)
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-13, 16:28
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default missing bits

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Wheeler View Post
This was the result of an incomplete RH bumper assy - one of the many parts missing off this blitz when it was rushed into service!
Correction - photos reveal it wasn't so much a lack of RH bumper bracket, but a lack of front crossmember to bolt it onto! This would have left the small RH piece to take the full force when challenged by the tree.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tonyblitz 130 - Copy.jpg (109.4 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg tonyblitz 132 - Copy.jpg (55.4 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg tonyblitz 133 - Copy.jpg (85.2 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg tonyblitz 137 - Copy.jpg (88.1 KB, 36 views)
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-13, 21:00
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: HIGHTON VIC
Posts: 8,218
Default The crash

Oh, I remember it well! I was wondering what it would feel like to smash my face into the top of the windscreen, but fortunately the impact wasn't that great.
__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-02-13, 11:56
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Webb View Post
Oh, I remember it well! I was wondering what it would feel like to smash my face into the top of the windscreen, but fortunately the impact wasn't that great.
Yes, we really could have used some seat belts that day! Fortunately there were plenty of saplings to slow us down a bit before finally hitting the tree. I think this photo Keith took may show part of the scene.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tonyblitz 140 - Copy.jpg (69.4 KB, 36 views)
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016