![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lang,
Looks far too nice to make it into something it never was. Maybe sell it to a Humber collector and invest the $$ in a genuine one from O/S.....? Mike C |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think if you wanted a green one there would be enough tired and rusty ones around to play with.
You could always go at it from an angle and mark it out as a Ministry / Official car of some sort without any real alterations
__________________
Gordon, in Scotland |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Lang,
That is a nice example of a Super Snipe. I restored an ex-RAF 1945 Snipe staff car some years ago, photos here. The staff car has some differences such as wider wings to accommodate the 900-13 tyres, and the departure angle of the body is greater. It would be a shame to mess with your car, you could always "claim" it was an Impressed vehicle. This was done in the early part of the War when vehicles were short and a lot of staff cars were obtained this way.
__________________
Richard 1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2 Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS KVE President & KVE News Editor |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like it stays as-is.
Interesting once you look at the differences between the wartime body and the MK1. Stand-out things are the bulged boot/trunk on the later car and the cloth roof versus solid with sun-roof as well as single front seat for military and individual for the MK1. I am sure there are other differences. Lang |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Lang
Great post of HUMBER with the history it should stay original. Just get a Pretty ATS Driver to sit up front and drive. Maybe a couple flags up on the front wings, my wife says to learn to do the Royal Wave, maybe a stuffed gorgi. But then again may be having a pretty ATS driver is the way to go with many vehicles. Cheers
__________________
Phil Waterman `41 C60L Pattern 12 `42 C60S Radio Pattern 13 `45 HUP http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/ New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil,
You are right about saving it. We do not need a driver as it already has, admittedly not pretty, an ATS driver (Arthritic, Timid, Senile). Lang |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Timid Lang? I doubt the fellow in Istanbul that left the 'discussion' minus his shirt buttons the day after I was robbed would agree.
Thanks again for the try. Dave
__________________
Hell no! I'm not that old! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think the early Snipe staff cars had individual front seats. The boot was not all that large once the spare 900-13 was in place. For a large car, I found it had less room for the driver than a Mini ! The steering wheel is adjustable, on splines and with it pushed right in and the seat right back I still found it cramped. Other that it rides well with plenty of power, considering the same engine powered the 8 ton Humber armoured car. regards, Richard
__________________
Richard 1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2 Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS KVE President & KVE News Editor |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Lang,
I missed this thread when it first ran. Happy to hear you will leave it as-is. Normally I think an owner is entitled to do with his vehicle like he wishes, but in this case I think it would have made you eligible for getting tarred and feathered and run out of MLU ![]() Hanno
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|