MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-13, 14:02
BSM's Avatar
BSM BSM is offline
BSM
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 73
Default Fuel tanks

Mike & Euan whilst you have a good point and possibly just a tad of speculation (and I agree that Official documents don't always get it right!) the Danes seem to agree with the Figs. quoted in the Field Specs. I refer to the data quoted on this link... http://www.armyvehicles.dk/chevyc60x.htm
i.e., Fuel capacity: 110 liter (24 gallons)!!!
I think there is a C60X at Emu Gully.....maybe one should ask the owners if the tanks are original and what is their capacity. A good discussion point nevertheless!
Rod

Last edited by BSM; 07-06-13 at 14:09.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-13, 14:36
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: HIGHTON VIC
Posts: 8,218
Default Speculation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSM View Post
Mike & Euan whilst you have a good point and possibly just a tad of speculation (and I agree that Official documents don't always get it right!) the Danes seem to agree with the Figs. quoted in the Field Specs. I refer to the data quoted on this link... http://www.armyvehicles.dk/chevyc60x.htm
i.e., Fuel capacity: 110 liter (24 gallons)!!!
I think there is a C60X at Emu Gully.....maybe one should ask the owners if the tanks are original and what is their capacity. A good discussion point nevertheless!
Rod
Rod, here are a couple of pictures, one in Canada, one in Australia of C60X clearly showing 21 gallon tanks as fitted in the factory, complete with the guard as the gun tractors used. The only difference between these and the gun tractor tanks as Euan pointed out was the filler neck.

Canadian



Australian

__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-13, 16:11
BSM's Avatar
BSM BSM is offline
BSM
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 73
Default

Keith thanks much for the great pics and supporting comments. Certainly makes recognition much easier as they are obviously of the size suggested earlier. One was not calling into question the accuracy of the comments made but more along the lines of questioning the anomaly/s that other sizes were documented elsewhere from opposite sides of the globe! Rod
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-06-13, 18:30
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,391
Default

Rod,

Yes, a tad of speculation, but not regarding the size of the tank (which I was reasonably sure of) - only why some clerk made the error, the true reason for which we will probably never know.

The Australian Contract Demand for 120 of C60X chassis in CKD form included 'Gas tanks, external measurements 13.5 inches x 12 inches x 40 inches' which converts to a volume of around 28 gallons. Take out the rounded corners, recessed ends, wall thickness, etc and its still closer to 21 gallons than 12 (or 12.5 gallons).

Mike C
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-13, 16:15
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
The Australian Contract Demand for 120 of C60X chassis in CKD form included 'Gas tanks, external measurements 13.5 inches x 12 inches x 40 inches' which converts to a volume of around 28 gallons. Take out the rounded corners, recessed ends, wall thickness, etc and its still closer to 21 gallons than 12 (or 12.5 gallons).

Just for fun I measured my FGT8 fuel tank: 1018 x 305 x 344mm, which converts exactly to C60X measurements above.

Unfortunately my tank is dented so I'm unable to measure actual liquid volume, however it can be calculated quite accurately as Mike suggests:

Subtracting recessed ends (2 x 18 mm) and wall thickness (2 x 1.5mm) gives 979 x 302 x 341mm = 100.8 litres. Subtracting rounded corners (65 mm radius) gives 100.8 - 3.5 = 97.3 litres = 21.4 gals. Subtracting baffle plates would bring this slightly closer to the nominal 21 gal spec.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg TONY6316 - Copy (2).jpg (47.5 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg TONY6316 - Copy.jpg (47.4 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg TONY6315 - Copy.jpg (74.2 KB, 15 views)
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.

Last edited by Tony Wheeler; 08-06-13 at 16:28.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016