MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-13, 14:48
rob love rob love is online now
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,609
Default

A-19 will be the designation for the Canadian Army Service Corp Training Center that the truck belonged to. L is for Lorry, and the remainder is the DND number assigned to the truck.

The date on the steering box is a casting date. It may have been a while before that casting made it onto the truck, so that may not be the best way to date the vehicle. It is also possible the steering box got changed out at some point. However, since your truck has the holes for the bumper reflectors, and does not have the FORD script on the cowl, that date is possible.

Last edited by rob love; 12-06-13 at 14:55.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-13, 15:41
Gordon Yeo Gordon Yeo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clinton Ontario
Posts: 414
Default 60 cwt door number

Here is a door number in the Chev 60 cwt that was a signals truck. What would the door numbers represent on this vehicle?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2778.jpg (27.8 KB, 17 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-06-13, 01:39
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default

From the 1920s to approx 1942-43 the Canadian Army operated two parallel vehicle fleets. The first was managed by the Master General of Ordnance (MGO). These vehicles were issued to individual units/schools.
The second fleet was the RCASC fleet and consisted of vehicles operated solely by the Royal Canadian Army Service Corps. These included staff cars, base maintenance vehicles, buses, specialty vehicles such as ploughs (plows) but not vehicles unique to a Corps (Engineers, Ordnance, etc.), transport and supply vehicles and others. RCASC vehicles were operated by RCASC personnel.
Clear as mud?

Clive
__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-06-13, 03:32
Bob Carriere Bob Carriere is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hammond, Ontario
Posts: 5,259
Default what ...?

...must be getting dummer with old age....

..... or was it a ploy to Kornphuse the enemy ????

what is the differece between a RCASC truck picking up parts from a Railroad depot to a truck from the R. DE Chaud. picking up similar parts from the same RR depot...?

all these years in the Pubic Service should have thought me something...?

Bob C
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B
C15a Cab 11
Hammond, Ontario
Canada
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-06-13, 03:42
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default

Bob,
You should know better than to try to find logic in the Army!
Obviously there is no difference in the scenario you identify. However, in most cases it is the role of the RCASC to pick up parts from the RR station while the R de CHAUD vehicle was there to support unit training. This doesn't mean that the Chaud CO couldn't order his driver to do a pick up but if the goods were in the military supply system and had to go via the QM Stores prior to unit/individual issue then it is most likely an RCASC lorry that would be dispatched, by the QM, to pick up the goods.
To over simplify the difference between the two fleets, MGO vehicles were issued to units to provide support to the unit while RCASC vehicles were to provide support to the Army.

Clive
__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-06-13, 03:56
Bob Carriere Bob Carriere is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hammond, Ontario
Posts: 5,259
Default Scary......

.....it's starting to make sense.....

I am leaning toward a not RCASC marking for my truck..... such as.....
R. DE Saleberrie (aka regiment de Hull) which was an armored corp. ...... will need to contact the archivist for the regiment to see what they were issued in 1940..... or even waht status it had in 1940.....

Bob C
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B
C15a Cab 11
Hammond, Ontario
Canada
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-06-13, 14:28
Bill Alexander's Avatar
Bill Alexander Bill Alexander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 272
Default

Hi Bob, The R de Hull were converted to armour on April 1, 1946. They were organized as an infantry battalion and served as one during the Second World War, when mobilized on July 29, 1941.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016