Ford Blitz Restoration/Rebuild

[Slava]

Tony,
I looked over your thread long before and with a lot of interest.
Almost my hat off!
I probably put my cheers to you before but forgot it was done or not.
Good luck on your way.
Vlad.

[Private_collector]

As promised earlier, here are some photos of my escepades of recent times.
2x NOS Oil Dip Sticks 1.jpg 2x NOS Oil Dip Sticks 2.jpg
The NOS dipsticks I found at the Gympie Swap Meet on 14th.I only opened one. It cleaned up VERY well.
Heads painted 2.jpg
Heads were cleaned thoroughly, water necks repaired, then a lick of paint to make em pretty. You may notice the neck is wider at opening than closer to the head. That's my attempt to keep the hoses in place, since the remnants of the original rings around the circumfrence (for that purpose) were almost obliterated when the repairs were done.
Left side exhaust pipe painted.jpg
This is one of the exhaust pipes I was talking about. Is 2" tube the correct size for these trucks? I was considering making enquiries around town for a suitable (but not authentic!) round muffler, but will hold off doing so until I know the correct tube size.
Oil pan painted.jpg
This bloody oil pan didn't arf give me jip! My own fault though. Never mix paint types on same part.

[Private_collector]

These spring clamps were made to replace the originals, which were damaged and mis-matched (two different types on same spring set!?!?). Is that original spec.? A local welding/fabricating shop did the folding for me. The bushes you see are for the front of main spring leaves. I don't know how, but I must have lost the original ones. I do know they were buggered, but would have been REALLY HELPFUL to give them to a lathe operator for duplication in original specifications. Guess they will turn up now that I don't need them any more.
New front spring clamps & spring bushes.jpg
Not a bad fit. All except one of the rivet shafts remained stuck firmly in their respective hole. The missing one was replaced by welding a very short piece of round rod to the clamp going in that location. I considered building up weld on all the clamps to replicate the rivet heads, but it would have taken me hours to whittle the blobs back to a round dome. I know, I tried it! I'm also too shakey to hold the grinder accurately. Maybe I could glue little wooden buttons on them.
I still need to remove the excess thread on the clamp bolts. Will do that in the morning, just before I 'string em up' for painting.
New front spring clamps installed.jpg
The spring 'eyes' at front were not round, so the new bushes had to be ground down to the right profile. I used a pedastal grinder with fine stone wheel. Once the bulk of the metal was removed, I finished off the last little bit of shaping with a hand file. I don't EVER want to do that job again. Painfully slow if you're as paranoid as I am about taking too much metal.
New front spring bushes installed.jpg
Despite being careful, the bushes were not a 100% perfect fit, which means the grease would have pumped out the sides instead of getting to the spring pins. That's bad! Sealed the bushes completely, using the pliable metal substitute that was used to rebuild the water necks of the engine heads. It's really good stuff, and I have no doubt that it will do the job. I have a sore thumb now, from forcing the stuff in between bush and spring eye. And Yes, I did remember to make the grease hole in both bushes. They even line up.
New front spring bushes, sealed.jpg



This is how the front springs used to look.
Front springs 1.jpg

[Bob McNeill]

Tony since the grease is fed from the pin to the bush the spring eye will only get the excess, well that how I see it.

[Private_collector]

Hello Bob,

Not how these springs are set up. The main leaf end has a threaded hole for a grease nipple (or is it a 'zerk'). The grease passes through bush and to the pin via a machined inner channel running around the ID of the bush. If not sealed, the grease would take path of least resistance and squish out the gap between bush and spring eye.

Having said all that, the pivoting rear pins of each spring ARE the type that have lubing via the way you described! I bloody well wish the fronts were too, to be quite frank. I think it's a much better idea. Some day i'll come across a couple of new pins like the rear type, and will make that change to the front.

I got the front springs painted this morning. Did the rear pin retainers and nuts at the same time. The U bolts have been cleaned this afternoon and undercoated. I am still to do the set of plates that attach the axle to the springs. Those should get blasted. They are not in bad shape, but there's no other way for me to clean out the recesses. I'll do that blasting at home. I would have had those finished today too, except I had to make an unscheduled stop to all work, to try and protect my 'new' little car from an approaching hail storm. Quickly lined the roof, bonnet (hood) and rear hatch with some carpet remnants, then put a car cover over it all to keep everything in place! This car was bought new by my Brother, 5 years ago. It has now been given to me. It's such a tiny thing and only had 19,750km on the odometer when I got it the other day. Now has 21,000km on it. Most of that has been in trips to/from Mothers place, just north of Brisbane. Not one scratch or paint chip on it anywhere, with exception of the wheel trims. The last thing I wanna see is hail damage on it. I need to build an extention to our undercover car storage, to preserve its great condition.

Won an auction for a set of 3 genuine Ford battery caps. The type for the correct battery that Ford would have used in the early to mid 40s. Hopefully I will have some exciting news to tell on the topic of batteries, in a couple of days time.

[T Creighton]

Originally Posted by Private_collector

These spring clamps were made to replace the originals, which were damaged and mis-matched (two different types on same spring set!?!?). Is that original spec.?

Hi Tony,
It's pleasing to see you back continuing your interesting thread again.

The front springs have two different style clamps.
Bolted ones on the front half and fold-over ones on the rear half.
It's to do with having less clearance between the spring and chassis at the back I would think.
After being rivetted to their respective spring leaves the folded ones are manouvered over the main leaf then the intermediate leaves are slid in between (with a bit of hammering), then the centre bolt and the front clamp bolts fitted.
On my truck I ground all the rust from the mating spring leaf surfaces, primed them, then gave a coat of Molybdenum di sulphide grease to get a nice smooth spring action.
Some say that this can cause broken leaves but I have never seen that happen.
Kind regards,
Terry.

[Private_collector]

Originally Posted by T Creighton

The front springs have two different style clamps.
Bolted ones on the front half and fold-over ones on the rear half.
It's to do with having less clearance between the spring and chassis at the back I would think.

Oh God, Terry! Don't tell me the springs may not fit, now that I have made all the clamps bolt on type! I guess I could get replacements made easy enough, but whole thing will need painting again.

I will have to do a test fit tomorrow afternoon, if I can.

Thanks for the info.

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Originally Posted by Private_collector

I was considering making enquiries around town for a suitable (but not authentic!) round muffler, but will hold off doing so until I know the correct tube size.

Pete Ashby once told me a Volvo 240-series exhaust muffler makes for a good replacement; the flathead keeps a throaty roar with one of these fitted.

H.

[Private_collector]

Thanks for telling me about the Volvo muffler, Hanno.

I took another look at the Ford manual, and it shows front springs with bolt-on clamps all round. Anxiously looking forward to the test-fit this afternoon.

20130923_061642.jpg

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Originally Posted by Private_collector

This is one of the exhaust pipes I was talking about. Is 2" tube the correct size for these trucks?

Tony,

1-3/4" seems to be the standard, reportedly bigger diameter pipe makes it lose the "old flathead" sound. If you want I can measure up my truck's exhaust pipe tomorrow.

Hanno

[Private_collector]

Thanks Hanno!

That would be great, if no inconvenience. I'm not i a great rush.

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Originally Posted by Private_collector

Thanks Hanno!

That would be great, if no inconvenience. I'm not i a great rush.

Tony,

Just took a picture and some measurements. The diameter of the front pipes connecting to the exhaust manifolds are 1.5", the rear pipe after they merge is indeed 2" diameter like "theotherTony" stated. My bad.

Hope this helps,
Hanno

[Private_collector]

Thanks Hanno! Thats excellent news. My pipes are the same, except the short piece for right side header doesn't have the bend that yours has half way along the part that connects to the left side. It does fit my engine though, and does not prevent the drain plug from being removed.

I just won an auction for this Ford battery box. No internals, just the box, so it shouldn't cost a kidney to ship from USA to here. I'm hoping to get a mold taken from it, and have fibreglass reproductions made for sale.
$T2eC16V,!y0FI,Bv8(ZMBSMg,Ljh0Q~~60_57.jpg $T2eC16d,!zUFIcl9sVUsBSMg,EzhN!~~60_57.jpg
Didn't want to say too much about this until I had actually been successful with the purchase.

Also started looking closely at the Volvo mufflers. Several different mufflers show up as 240 series, but I know the ones you were talking abouy, and SHOULD be able to order one locally.

[Private_collector]

As you see, the battery top that comes with the case is just a flat piece of perspex. I will remedy that myself.
$T2eC16dHJI!FHRzSPL(cBSL9WSLJQg~~60_35.jpeg
These NOS caps will help me.

[Tony Wheeler]

Originally Posted by Private_collector

My pipes are the same, except the short piece for right side header doesn't have the bend that yours has half way along the part that connects to the left side. It does fit my engine though, and does not prevent the drain plug from being removed.

Here's a pic of the original set up Tony. It's handy having a few reference vehicles in the back yard! I believe the bend in the RH engine pipe is to prevent it fouling the diff housing, just like the cutaway in the front crossmember. However it sounds like yours passes even further back near the drain plug...?

[Tony Wheeler]

Originally Posted by Private_collector

This is one of the exhaust pipes I was talking about. Is 2" tube the correct size for these trucks? I was considering making enquiries around town for a suitable (but not authentic!) round muffler, but will hold off doing so until I know the correct tube size.

Your engine pipe looks correct to me Tony. All my Fords have 2" engine pipes. Two of them have what appear to be original mufflers (dished end plates, 6" diameter, 18" length) and both of these have 1 5/8" tailpipes. This is consistent with several original tailpipe brackets examined by Jacques and me recently. We determined that they're designed for 1 5/8" pipe. They will accept 1 3/4" pipe, but will not fully close when tightened.

I notice Macs Auto have a suitable muffler for about $58, however it's probably not worth the inconvenience.

[Private_collector]

Thanks very much, Tony!

All this information from you fellows is valuable and greatly helps me to make the right decisions.
$(KGrHqR,!jYFDgmmB8w+BR!H4j81Gg~~60_57.jpg $T2eC16d,!ysE9sy0jKf0BR!H4zmc0Q~~60_57.jpg
I had once investigated ordering one of these from USA, but cost of shipping was incredible. From memory, muffler was less than $90, shipping was more than $200! Bugger that.
$(KGrHqN,!qcFC5srddwYBR!H4pKyG!~~60_57.jpg
It was a genuine Ford product too.

I downloaded these 3 photos at time of first contact with the vendor, but have lost where their I wrote down their web address. Can't order one now, even if I wanted to pay the roughly $300 it would have cost me!

[Private_collector]

Yeeeeeees!
20130923_172225.jpg 20130923_172255.jpg
The test fitting of one front spring set has shown the new clamps clear everything very nicely. Under very heavy loading or lots of side to side torsion, that may be a different story, but it would have to be fairly extreme flexion to be a problem.

[T Creighton]

Originally Posted by Private_collector

Yeeeeeees!
Attachment 60595 Attachment 60596
The test fitting of one front spring set has shown the new clamps clear everything very nicely. Under very heavy loading or lots of side to side torsion, that may be a different story, but it would have to be fairly extreme flexion to be a problem.

Glad they fit Tony. Heaps of clearance all round.
Strange that the Parts Catalogue and the MBF1 show different pictures. The parts book lists the different clips for all models F15A and up.
Terry

[Private_collector]

Maybe it's one of those 'old VS new' style things.
Anyhow, as long as it works!

[Tony Wheeler]

Originally Posted by T Creighton

Strange that the Parts Catalogue and the MBF1 show different pictures.

I believe the diagram in the workshop manual is incorrect. Early production springs are as per Parts List diagram. Late production springs have one additional leaf, and the rear clips are the same type as the front but are inverted and have a heavy steel bush over the bolt (see pic below).

It would appear there was some concern about the rear clips fouling the chassis, although as Tony says it would require extreme spring flexion for this to occur. However if it did occur it would be very unhealthy for the spring, and could potentially snap the top leaf at that point.