MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Gun Park

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-14, 05:58
Bob McNeill Bob McNeill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange, NSW Australia
Posts: 465
Default numbers

Mike, thanks, Dad was was 2/9th and they eventually had 2 short 25s at different times, one before 18 battery went to Dutch NG and one after. I,ve been lucky enough to obtain a shield for a short 25 which has 2/4th written on it. Checked my other frame and couldn,t come up with anything of value. Dad is third on left in Nth Qld, in Canberra in last and he still doesn,t like the Short.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg LastScan.jpg39.jpg (64.8 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg LastScan140.jpg (118.0 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg LastScan5.jpg (65.0 KB, 24 views)
__________________
macca C15 C15A
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-14, 21:23
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,390
Default

I see you aimed the display at Parliament House, rather than the High Court!! It would have to be a toss-up, wouldn't it?

He's not alone: when I interviewed several gunners back in the '80s (before the first Profile was written) it became quickly evident that the 'Guns, QF, 25-pdr (Short)' were almost universally despised by gunners who had the misfortune to have to use them.
(The Jungle Scale regiments, usually one Battery per Regiment, the other batteries being equipped with the un-modified 25-pdr.)

Were you aware your gun was a combat veteran? Will you mark it as 2/1 Aust Fd Regt?

Mike C
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-14, 02:16
Bob McNeill Bob McNeill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange, NSW Australia
Posts: 465
Default target

Mike, deliberate move and a number of people took photo,s from breech end, note the No 5 Carbine also on trail, shortened lighter muzzle flash hider not accurate, all the problems of the 25,s. Will have to redo the Short into its correct configuration [ the old man can disown it then ] now that we have
a history. this unit has parts of several shorts in its makeup [ 124 , 130 ] as nearly all shorts sold out of Bathurst in 46-47. Thanks
__________________
macca C15 C15A
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-14, 17:41
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,679
Default

Mike. You have my curiosity now. Why were these guns so disliked?

David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-03-14, 18:02
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,390
Default

Hi David,

The crux of the matter was the short barrel, no shield, light weight and no traversing platform, all of which contributed to, at firing, the gun bouncing and getting way off line after each shot and the mighty back blast/shock wave with each shot with the high discomfort for the crew that resulted.

A few shots were bad enough, but apparently the firing a mission was particularly hard on the crew: headaches, ears ringing, etc etc

Doubtless Bob, who has a direct line to an old gunner with Short experience, can provide more, but I think the above pretty much covers the main aspects as I gleaned them from earlier interviews.

Mike C
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-03-14, 00:05
Bob McNeill Bob McNeill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange, NSW Australia
Posts: 465
Default dislike

Dad started his gunner experience on 18Pr,s of several Marks and when they went to the Middle East the 2-9th had 4.5 howitsers and the British 25,s. On return to Australia, once in Nth Qld they prepared for New Guinea. After using one of the best Field Guns ever made to be given a Short 25 which had 48" off the barrel, 16" off recoil cylinders, no shield, had to be relaid after every shot, regularly cracked the trail welds, did not sit well with the gunners. The fact that the Short 25 was scrapped out in 1946 says something.
__________________
macca C15 C15A
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-14, 00:32
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,679
Default Mike and Bob

Wow! Sounds like something designed by a civil servant and not a gunner!

Thank you both for the explanation.


David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CMP Part Numbers: "Neutral Numbers" BCA Parts/Sources/Prices 9 11-07-11 04:23
cfr numbers. jim fraser (RIP) Post-war Military Vehicles 7 18-09-09 05:31
Ram WD census numbers servicepub (RIP) The Armour Forum 54 23-03-06 00:37
WD-numbers Rolf S. Ask The Carrier Forum 0 27-02-06 13:45
WD Numbers servicepub (RIP) WW2 Military History & Equipment 3 11-07-04 23:30


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016