![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If anybody needs these, I can do them as required. I would suggest EN8 and I would thread them in a capstan using a Coventry diehead, this would give perfect threads.
__________________
Adrian Barrell |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian, can you explain the EN system? I remember (as a young fella) the steel crank to have for a Lotus twin cam was made from EN40B.
If I was over there, I'd be taking up your offer. ![]()
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lynn, it's the old British system BS970, superseded some years ago by a newer version with different codes.
Freecutting MS that you mentioned was EN1A and is now 230M07 where the 07 indicates carbon content, i.e 0.07 %. EN8 is now 080M40 so 0.4%. Carbon content is a good indicator of a steels ability to be hardened. EN40B is now 722M24 and is a 3% chromium molydenum nitriding steel that when nitrogen hardened (nitriding) has a very hard wear resistant case and a tough (60tons) core. Ideal for a crank!
__________________
Adrian Barrell |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just thinking out loud, how much load can you put on the brake rod in reality? Do you think the small lever that is the brake pedal has sufficient length to pull a set of threads ?
I am only asking as I have access to a load of mild rod I understand the need for a greater tensile if the rod worked in compression ![]() It's a shame that I need to go order some EN8 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't want to come in late and blow it to bits but I used shiny mild steel rod for my long brake rods, I didn't think that the threads would ever pull off or the mild steel rod to be inferior, the clevis's are screwed on about an inch and a bit with a locknut so its not like they are compromised by being held by 3-4 turns. I cut my own thread using hand tools and the rods are working fine. Also made the engine to rear plate and clutch rods with mild as well as the accelerator rod. When cutting the old rods I replaced (as parts were excessively rusty, I cut them with a hacksaw) then re used sections I did not notice any increase in hardness. My carrier has been getting around fine. Im not saying take my advice as im just a mechanic, but if you have a supply of mild it would poss do.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lew it may be fine with mild steel (aren't some LP2 rods 1/2 inch?) but in this day and age of blame and litigation, I wouldn't knowingly be using an inferior component in my brakes.
Richard for the money you have spent on your carrier already, the rod is very cheap. Adrian, Thank you for the explanation.
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm sure mild steel would be fine though, normal bright mild steel is EN3B, it has a tensile strength of about 80% that of EN8.
__________________
Adrian Barrell |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My thoughts being if the brake rod pushed the shoes on the rod would flex, and the need for higher tensile steel would be required.... Of course I could be way off as my understanding is negligible in this area.
I have dropped you a PM Adrian.
__________________
is mos redintegro __5th Div___46th Div__ 1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI* Lower Hull No. 10131 War Department CT54508 (SOLD) 1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration). 1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard, All the rods pull, none push.
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|