MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-03-15, 13:52
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maple_leaf_eh View Post
War Diary 27th Canadian Armoured Regiment, 07 Jun 44.

The Sherman V(C) tanks which use petrol were in a worse state for fuel than the Sherman III tanks which use DERVE
Sherman VC = Petrol
Sherman III = Derv(e)

Am sure the reason for insisting that all Fireflies were Petrol was to reduce complexity in the supply chain.

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-03-15, 19:23
tankbarrell tankbarrell is offline
Adrian Barrell
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 860
Default

The Sherman III was not suitable for conversion to 17 pdr. I think that is because the generators protrude into the fighting compartment enough to prevent fitting of the ammunition stowage.
__________________
Adrian Barrell
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sherman Firefly Ic 1st Hussars Johnny Canuck The Armour Forum 13 04-12-13 04:10
Firefly Sherman Info Needed pzrwest The Armour Forum 5 13-01-11 14:55
Sherman Firefly on D-Day luc désormeaux The Armour Forum 5 10-07-05 16:00
Sherman Firefly Most Underrated Tank Of The War Wolfkin The Armour Forum 10 21-05-05 04:00
Sherman Firefly in Italy Larry Hayward The Armour Forum 1 01-04-04 10:07


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016