MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17-12-15, 21:15
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
Don't forget the Australian ones. The AWM has photos of them. I think they are in North Africa?
Also, I think (not 100% sure) they show up in some of the Dunkirk photos as well.
Hanno?
Ah yes, of course we need to differentiate between the Light Tank Mark I to Mark V - a series of related designs of light tank produced by Vickers for the British Army during the interwar period.

Above, I was referring to the commercial Vickers Carden Loyd tanks.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_...United_Kingdom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-12-15, 04:53
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default Color

Hanno, thanks for the info on the color. I looked at the link you posted to the Netherlands East Indies photos. They all seem to be in a solid color, not camouflage. Except the one restored picture from the Bovington tank museum.
I agree many countries including the East Indies and Greece got a few into the front lines in time to lose them to the Germans or Japanese. Latvia got the gun mounted ones as well but lost them to the Russians. The only intact, surviving evidence of a 2pdr armed one I can find is the one captured in Latvia to be displayed Moscow, currently in Kubinka museum. I have photos of it from there in both camo and solid green. There are also a few combat photos of them in the field prior to being destroyed.
Attached is the only color photo I can find of the 2pdr mounted tank in Latvian hands before the Russians invaded. I think I will do a solid green all over, and then when I get time I will add the camo to it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Latvian tank on the move.jpg (58.8 KB, 34 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-12-15, 10:44
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Bradshaw View Post
Hanno, thanks for the info on the color. I looked at the link you posted to the Netherlands East Indies photos. They all seem to be in a solid color, not camouflage. Except the one restored picture from the Bovington tank museum.
I agree many countries including the East Indies and Greece got a few into the front lines in time to lose them to the Germans or Japanese. Latvia got the gun mounted ones as well but lost them to the Russians. The only intact, surviving evidence of a 2pdr armed one I can find is the one captured in Latvia to be displayed Moscow, currently in Kubinka museum. I have photos of it from there in both camo and solid green. There are also a few combat photos of them in the field prior to being destroyed.
Attached is the only color photo I can find of the 2pdr mounted tank in Latvian hands before the Russians invaded. I think I will do a solid green all over, and then when I get time I will add the camo to it.
Jon,

Like I said, the Vickers camouflage scheme as seen on Bovington's Dutchman was - as far as I can tell - Vicker's own to make their products attractive to potential buyers. It does seem the Latvians copied it on their tanks, so if you are replicating the Latvian version you would have to get creative with brushes one day. Starting of with a base green would be a good idea, though..

For your information, the vehicles used by the Royal Netherlands East Indies Army (KNIL) vehicles were in a single green colour. This was called "camouflage green" and research proved it was practically the same as the current Federal Standard 595 Color FS 34102. Dutchman tanks in use for training British troops were a single green colour as well, most likely the one ordered by the KNIL.

Actually, if you look at this blog on interwar tank development by Vickers Armstrong Ltd most tracked vehicles shown on there are in a single green colour. I could only find one camouflaged vehicle, a tractor truck for China.

HTH,
Hanno
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-12-15, 04:31
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default That is a good looking green.

Thanks again Hanno. I looked up that color and it looks like a nice army shade of green. I will try to get some mixed up this winter so I can paint before spring.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-02-16, 06:49
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default Found some more pics from Kubinka.

Here are some war time pics of the little tanks being used. From what I read they were used in platoons with 2 mg tanks and 2 gun mounted tanks. Seems they were used a lot until they were destroyed.
Color on these pics is pretty vibrant, any opinion on how good the paint color match is?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg kubinka tank 8.jpg (87.1 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg vickers-17.jpg (78.4 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg kubinka tank 1.jpg (85.3 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg vickers-04.jpg (60.1 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg vickers-14.jpg (54.2 KB, 18 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-16, 04:07
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default For comparison.

Here are the pics of my tank, it has been painted since these were taken but only primer grey. Turret spins easily and seems well balanced. Will make a gun in the next year. I have had it out driving a few times and seem to have adjusted all the steering and braking brakes so it handles well. A bit scary on pavement as it likes to skid sideways on turns. Driving the chassis in reverse does not seem to hurt the steering system. It does seem more responsive in reverse but only slightly.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20151117_161311.jpg (135.4 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg 20151117_162743.jpg (150.1 KB, 13 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-16, 09:48
eddy8men eddy8men is offline
AKA Rick Wedlock
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: manchester
Posts: 715
Default

that's a really nice job. going to look great when it's finished
__________________
_______________________
1941 mk1 mortar Carrier
1941 Mk1* Carrier
1942 Mk1* Carrier
1943 T16 Carrier
1945 Mk3 Dingo
1941 Mk3 Covenanter
1941 Mk4 Churchill AVRE (now sold)
1944 Mk6 Cromwell (now sold)
1952 Mk3 Centurion
1952 ARV Centurion
1952 ARV Centurion
1953 Mk3 Centurion (breaking)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T16 Project begun... ajmac The Carrier Forum 4 22-06-10 21:31
Search and seizure has begun...RED ALERT Alex Blair (RIP) The Sergeants' Mess 12 02-12-07 04:35


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016