![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Made up by the actual guys who did it in service is not made up.
Made up by restorers or re-enactors is made up. The danger is that perhaps only one guy ever did it in the military, a prominent photo of it ends up in the history book, and restorers claim it was commonly done that way. For instance: large locker from the back of the universal carrier gets moved to the outer front of the carrier to make more room for crew: appears to have been done fairly regularly as evidenced in numerous photos. Not factory, nor approved, but done and I would suggest not incorrect for a restoration. How about the crooked invasion star on Canadian vehicles? Was this fairly rare or commonly done? Would it be incorrect to put it on mis-angled? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video review of "The Churchill Tank and the Canadian Armoured Corps" | servicepub (RIP) | The Sergeants' Mess | 0 | 29-04-12 19:26 |
New Book: "Amazing Airmen": "Canadian Flyers In The Second World War" | RAF21 | WW2 Military History & Equipment | 1 | 27-11-09 03:30 |
Book: "Canadian Armour in the Italian Campaign, 1943-1945" | Mike C | The Armour Forum | 3 | 29-11-07 14:39 |
Maritime Command Museum "Admiralty House" Bofors | Brad Mills | The Gun Park | 4 | 26-09-07 22:01 |
A "Duck Tale"--Story and photos of historic "swim-in" | jagjetta | Military Shows & Events | 1 | 14-09-07 03:26 |