MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-02-18, 03:27
jack neville jack neville is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: leopold, victoria
Posts: 1,034
Default

I wonder how many 4x4 or 6x6 vehicles produced by various countries were full time all wheel drive. Most have a transfer case to disconnect the front drive. Could this have something to do with MH AWD claim.
The later Ford Marmon Herrington gun tractors were fitted with a ‘compensator’ transfer case to eliminate windup in the driveline. A primitive centre diff.
For an Australian built vehicle to have full time AWD was quite unusual I’m thinking.
__________________
1943 Willys MB
Willys Trailer
1941 Fordson WOT 2H
1941 Fordson WOT 2H (Unrestored)
194? Fordson WOT 2D (Unrestored)
1939 Ford 1 ton utility (Undergoing restoration)
1940 Ford 1 ton utility (Unrestored)
1941 Ford 1 ton utility (Unrestored)
BSA folding bicycle
BSA folding bicycle
1941 Ford/Marmon Herrington 3A gun tractor
1941 Ford/Marmon Herrington 3 gun tractor (Unrestored)
1941 Diamond T 969 (Unrestored)
Wiles Junior Cooker x 2
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-02-18, 03:59
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,314
Default

Going back to the M135, all of the SAE terms:
On-Demand Synchro Variable Torque Passive System
On-Demand Synchro Variable Torque Active System
On-Demand Independently Powered Variable Torque Active System
seem awfully fancy compared to a system that was of the same vintage as the early LandRover described above (only slightly fancier in being linked to the reverse shift position, the truck had an automatic transmission as well to simplify driving). The variable torque of the M135 is basically binary, either engaged or not.
It would seem that the SAE J1952 standard was first published 1991,(well after the M135 and LandRover were designed) https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j1952_199101/ and to be a bit picky is only intended to apply to light trucks up to class 3 which seems to top out at 14000 pounds GVW. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truck_classification It isn't clear if this is the same class 3 definition SAE is using.
I could facetiously claim the 4wd system on my F350 is also "on demand" - when I demand power to the front wheels by moving the floor mounted shift lever, power is delivered.

I wasn't trying to tell anyone they were wrong, only to suggest that are a large variety of systems that can't all be neatly pigeon holed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-02-18, 04:25
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,672
Default

Grant

I was not suggesting you are wrong just that the SAE main descriptions are general names for the only three possibilities to achieve all wheel drive. Even then one could argue "on demand" is really a part time system. How they are arrived at is only limited by the imagination of the engineers and how complicated and expensive the manufacturers are willing to pursue development of the weird and wonderful.

I think the 3 general descriptions (part time, full time and on-demand) cover everything possible but the sub-list of methods and designs to achieve one of those 3 results will go on expanding forever.

It is still hard to pigeon hole a design. What about a vehicle that normally runs 90% rear and 10% front - got to be full time. But if it has sensors that detect rear wheel slip and feeds power to the front axle until there is a 50/50 sharing it has got to be on demand? And if you can turn the four wheel drive off completely it has to be part time?

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-02-18, 05:15
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,672
Default

Mike K

Thanks for the Landrover info.

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-02-18, 08:08
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Just love these wandering discussions .... just like asking 'what hat do we wear on ANZAC Day?' at a VMVC meeting!

Very interesting stuff, guys. I figured the collective wisdom would provide a veritable bounty on interesting replies: thank you all.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-02-18, 12:11
Ken Smith Ken Smith is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Qld Australia
Posts: 236
Default

Don't forget International called their 4 x 4 trucks, including our own teaspoon tippers All Wheel Drive. They had a nice little badge on both mudguards/fenders.
The badge was on AA series and the AB series as far as I know, and the same badge was used on the four cylinder Scouts from the early sixties.
Ken
__________________
1940 Cab 11 F15 1G-8129F
1941 Cab 12 C60L AIF L4710841 Middle East veteran
1941 Cab 12 F60L ARN 45818
1941 Cab 12 F60L ARN 46660
1941 Cab 12 F60L ARN 51720 A/T Portee
1942 Cab 13 F15 ARN 55236
1942 Cab 13 F60L ARN 58171 Mach "D" Loading
1942 Cab 13 C15 ARN 62400
1945 Cab 13 C60L ARN 77821
1941 Chevrolet 3 Ton GS ARN AIF L16070 Middle East veteran
Canadian REL (APF) radar trailer
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-02-18, 12:24
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,830
Default

A lot is written about this subject already, but I’d like to add that Marmon-Herrington’s core business, since 1931, is the design and production of All-Wheel Drive conversion kits (they built complete vehicles, even tanks, as well).

“All-Wheel Drive” was incorporated in their old logo, and the term was actively marketed by them.

3B45BAFF-A8F5-4438-8E7D-B1983A13F855.gif

Maybe they had it trademarked or patented? That is what I would have to look into. For now, I leave you with a link to my old M-H website:

http://www.mapleleafup.nl/marmonherrington/

HTH,
Hanno


18E3A37F-472E-4172-AA17-59FD5FF6EB23.jpeg 5B77C3D2-B2CA-4D70-BC2C-DE5962D6632A.jpeg 6F2B1A12-6E44-493E-8DB6-1EC5B0A3E7B2.jpeg

1A6B2E73-D16C-4733-A7F8-52DAE55FDE7B.jpeg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-02-18, 22:39
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,672
Default

Here is an interesting Quad story.

http://archive.commercialmotor.com/a...ment-for-mules
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Quad.jpg (92.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Quad2.jpg (70.8 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drive Wheel wood JoãoBoscoBarbosa The Restoration Forum 1 19-06-15 22:34
Four Wheel Drive Kitchener model B in Cdn Service? rob love The Softskin Forum 2 03-12-14 22:39
Wheel spacers - bogie wheel and track rollers Rob Beale The Carrier Forum 0 16-04-14 10:38
2 wheel drive. Nigel Watson The Softskin Forum 14 02-11-13 10:56
HUP first drive John Ganton The Restoration Forum 8 02-07-07 01:52


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016