MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-07-18, 12:04
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 565
Default

Colin,
The pick up assembly is purely a device designed to give the pump a pool of oil to draw from. The critical part of designing the intake to the pump is that there is oil there under all possible circumstances. In a tank this is more critical when the vehicle is going uphill as the engine will usually be at full throttle then whereas downhill it will usually be coasting so much less bearing load. Side slopes are a mid condition and flat usually easy to provide for. As I said before I think it is very important that you increase the oil capacity as much as is practical to prevent the oil overheating. It is not an option to use a car sump even if it was shallow enough to fit over the cross tube as you will boil the oil if you ever do any more than just potter about. Also loading onto a truck will let the pickup run dry as cars are not designed to be on that kind of slope. Remember that these tanks pitch badly both forwards and backwards in addition to the gradient.

Most relatively modern engines have the pipe from the pump going straight to the lowest point of the sump with a simple wire mesh strainer on the end and a tin shroud over that so that there only needs to be about 1/2" of oil to cover the intake. The CMP pickup is just a rather complicated version of that. Also modern oils have additives to reduce the foaming that wartime oils did not have. The CMP pickup would have been intended to try to separate air from the oil but that function is just not required any more.

You can have the pipe to the pump at any angle but the shorter it is the better. It is critical that it does not vibrate as it will vey quickly fall off ! It is also necessary that there is some sort of mesh to stop lose bits of rubbish being sucked in. Other than that it is just a matter of arranging things so that there is as much chance as possible of there being oil covering the end of the suction pipe. Sheet metal baffles that reduce the movement of the oil away from the pickup on slopes but still collect it from above can usually be designed and can be welded to the inside of the sump or fixed to the pickup as in what you have.

Not rocket science but just need some thought. Have fun !

David

PS: Colin posts much faster than me so I had not seen his solution when I wrote the above. I would put a horizontal baffle in the sump at the same hight as the new section and carrying on the line of the new section to almost the pickup. This would trap oil below it on uphill slopes but allow it to drain into the lower part of the sump on the flat. As it is you only have the capacity of the pickup assembly available when you are on an uphill slope and the oil has gone to the other end of the sump. The problem is that having reversed the engine the pickup is at the wrong end of the sump though I do agree that having the drain over the access hole in the floor is a good thing so the deep end of the sump needs to be where it is.

Last edited by David Herbert; 02-07-18 at 12:40.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-18, 23:39
colin jones's Avatar
colin jones colin jones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,810
Default

Hi David, sorry I posted so quick but I didn't think I would have sorted my problem so soon. Just to confirm though, the sump is still in the exact same rotation and configuration. What I have done is shorten the depth of the deep end and increase the depth on the low end which gave me more volume of oil in total by probably a litre. I do have the original oil cooler to connect to as well. The pick up was shortened by about 50mm. This should have fixed the problem and I will find out today when I do another trial fit.
Thankyou everyone for your help.
Colin.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-18, 06:08
colin jones's Avatar
colin jones colin jones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,810
Default

I have made and fitted the two new engine mounts which are made on the same principal as the original. The drive train fits like a glove.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20180704_104547.jpg (151.7 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 20180704_120045.jpg (223.1 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 20180704_131639.jpg (215.7 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 20180705_094841.jpg (143.1 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg 20180705_122200.jpg (167.9 KB, 5 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-18, 20:30
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,660
Default

Exciting times, Colin!

David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-07-18, 23:14
colin jones's Avatar
colin jones colin jones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,810
Default

Yes David, it's getting cccccloser.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-07-18, 05:22
colin jones's Avatar
colin jones colin jones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,810
Default

Having only one drive hub I am attempting to fabricate another. As far as I know, the missing one is on the Vickers at Duxford. Anyway! I cut some supports so it retains the flat surface while bending. I know I won't get the exact shape but somewhere acceptable. I drilled through all three sections to stop it from pulling in when under pressure.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20180708_154859.jpg (189.4 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 20180709_072449.jpg (179.9 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg 20180709_080547.jpg (169.6 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 20180709_082416.jpg (166.5 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg 20180709_082443.jpg (180.5 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-07-18, 05:26
colin jones's Avatar
colin jones colin jones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,810
Default

I am going to fabricate the bearing housings, weld and machine the excess off after completion. I need two more for the other tank but will wait until I decide what type of drive system will be suitable. after I weld in the boss, I will be able to lathe the outside perimeter down to size. The holes that are in the dish at the moment will be machined off and new holes put in the correct locations.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20180709_082812.jpg (194.8 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg 20180709_084936.jpg (153.1 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg 20180709_101033.jpg (222.1 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 20180709_102409.jpg (188.8 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Door Resto Barry Churcher The Restoration Forum 13 15-05-22 16:36
FAT cab 13 No 9 resto Mrs Vampire The Softskin Forum 27 29-09-21 07:11
C15A resto harrygrey382 The Restoration Forum 9 08-06-15 10:40
another CAN m37 resto Steve Wilson The Restoration Forum 11 25-08-12 16:57
m 37 resto in new brunswick pauljboudreau Post-war Military Vehicles 118 07-03-11 23:29


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016