MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-05, 15:37
RichTO90 RichTO90 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by John Tapsell
Rich - I'm interested in your comments about the difference between the LCT types. My understanding was that the (A) variant was armoured, but the CB variant was not (although identical in all other respects).
Well, considering the differences in our languages, the two navies involved were consistently inconsistent in how they referred to the different types. Normally they are all simply referred to as "LCT (A)" in the primary documentation - at least the narrative parts. So quite frequently an LCT (HE) may be referrred to in a group as LCT (A). But in the landing tables they are carefully differentiated. So it appears that in fact they were somewhat interchangeable. All had the raised timber ramp, but it may be questionable if the additrional armor was added to the conn? I really am not sure, although I strongly suspect that the only real difference was their function.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016