MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-10-18, 22:19
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,675
Default

According to Philippe Leger in his excellent book "Jerrycan" ISBN 9782840482444

The British gathered German cans from the early French campaign because they realised the superiority of that container.

They sent some to USA and the Americans played with the design - one must ask why? - and US production began in 1941.

British production did not commence until 1942 despite the widely known failings and unacceptable fuel losses from the square flimseys.

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-10-18, 03:46
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

I've got a reference somewhere to a directive from late 41/early 42 that all German fuel cans, ie jerry cans, located/recovered were to be turned over to Ordnance and not retained by individual units. It was an 8th Army directive, I think, but I'd have to locate it to be sure.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-10-18, 05:40
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
According to Philippe Leger in his excellent book "Jerrycan" ISBN 9782840482444

The British gathered German cans from the early French campaign because they realised the superiority of that container.

They sent some to USA and the Americans played with the design - one must ask why? - and US production began in 1941.

British production did not commence until 1942 despite the widely known failings and unacceptable fuel losses from the square flimseys.

Lang
Sometimes a production method is inferior to available technology, or to available plants. Maybe the stamping plant making little pieces was at full capacity, but the one making one big all-encompassing piece had capacity?
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-10-18, 08:11
Owen Evans Owen Evans is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 307
Default

More flimsies. Note the difference in colour around the cap.

Owen.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Flimsies.jpg (462.4 KB, 21 views)
__________________
1940 11 Cab C15
1939 DKW KS200
1951 Willys M38
1936 Opel Olympia
MVPA # 39159
MVT # 19406
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-10-18, 10:39
DaveBuckle's Avatar
DaveBuckle DaveBuckle is offline
Does he look like a Blitz
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Nowra Hill
Posts: 105
Default Those crazy Germans

The Germans also measured weights, volumes, distance, even heat in multiples of ten and called them things like: kilo, milli, metre, litre, etc., called a metric system or such - that'll never catch on ...
__________________
- Dave - (or Andrew)
1942 Blitz F15A
1969 Land Rover S2A FFT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-10-18, 11:14
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

There is a story about an engineer who smuggled jerry cans from Germany to Mongolia under a car, and took them to the USofA, where the idea was rejected. (the enemy item had to be inferior)
Quite a story. If I recall, Monty estimated a 25 percent loss of petrol stocks as standard, from flimsies.
The German can was fully welded. The American can had a rolled seam at the bottom, that leaked.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-10-18, 13:44
Lauren Child Lauren Child is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 281
Default

lol, I recognise that finger in the pamphlet photo

Here are some pics I posted on facebook comparing flimsy with others.

Yep, the screw capped one is returnable, and much better made. I’d need to look the pamphlet out again to check, but I’m 99% sure it was specifically on fuel, so yes it’s for petrol.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-10-18, 18:14
Owen Evans Owen Evans is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lauren Child View Post
lol, I recognise that finger in the pamphlet photo
Aha! So that's where that photo came from originally. Nice collection you have there.

Yet more hijacking of this post, but any thoughts on the attached photo? I've seen Canadian 2 gallon cans with this stamping before, but only 1940 dated ones. 1941 cans are usually blank, apart from the year and broad arrow C. I suspect the cap is non-original.

Owen.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 06.jpg (451.3 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 10.jpg (328.1 KB, 2 views)
__________________
1940 11 Cab C15
1939 DKW KS200
1951 Willys M38
1936 Opel Olympia
MVPA # 39159
MVT # 19406
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fake flimsy petrol can David DeWeese WW2 Military History & Equipment 14 11-03-16 03:56
Is this a flimsy? Ebay? Rob Fast Auction and Classified Ad Site Heads Up 11 07-05-13 01:10
WTK: C6 Mounts for Iltis, Command and Reconnaisance & Other Mounts T. Alcorn Post-war Military Vehicles 27 19-08-10 19:02
2 Gallon Flimsy Kuno The Softskin Forum 6 08-07-10 14:28
Flimsy fuel can flex hoses/spouts 19 sets ect Dean (Ajax) For Sale Or Wanted 35 09-04-09 00:03


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:22.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016