MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-08-19, 05:34
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

David, thanks for the information. I stand corrected. I thought these fittings were obsolete but I see Amazon is still happy to sell me all types of them!

Mike, I suspect the 4 gallons per suspension unit is correct. Each unit is about 3 feet long, about 10" wide and the shock absorber section at the top is about 6" deep, which works out to be a volume of about 8 gallons. I'm reluctant to commit 16 gallons of oil to the 4 suspension units that have shocks without being sure that it's doing something useful. According to our expert here, the T-54 didn't have shocks either. So did they go out of fashion after the war?

What puzzles me is if you neglect the shocks because they are not effective, what happens when they'd seize up?
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-08-19, 17:21
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,381
Default

Tony,

I put a thank you up for the grease info yesterday, but it seems to have evaporated (must have hit the wrong key!)

So... thank you. All adds to what we know.

Malcolm, 4 gallons each: that's going to be expensive, but better to put at least some oil in each, I'd suggest. You are not going to war in it, so enough oil for the very limited use it will be subjected to, ie just enough to prevent seizing.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-19, 18:27
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm Towrie View Post
What puzzles me is if you neglect the shocks because they are not effective, what happens when they'd seize up?
To my mind, there is a huge difference between a shock that is moving but not absorbing much shock and a unit that is behaving more or less as a solid steel rod (seized). As stated above, enough oil to stop it becoming solid would seem to be good.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-19, 04:05
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

I agree, I'll fill up the reservoirs. The spec'd OM-13 is a very thin hydraulic oil, with an ISO viscosity of 12-13 cS. These lighter oils are expensive, so I think I'll use the common ISO 32 hydraulic oil. I can get 20 litres for $50, so about $200 total. That's no problem. And we'll only be out $200 if it all leaks out.


Malcolm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sold: GM shock absorber BCA For Sale Or Wanted 2 17-02-18 21:45
Wiring Routing Over Rear Shock Absorber Eric Szalanda The Restoration Forum 7 09-10-17 06:44
CENTURION Question? jdmcm The Armour Forum 4 10-04-17 05:11
WTB two rear shock absorber links M38CDNBill For Sale Or Wanted 0 29-09-09 05:11
Centurion Mk 11 Question Dan Martel Post-war Military Vehicles 5 11-09-07 02:44


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016