MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-12-20, 03:20
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default

Thanks for all the input. After a week of searching I have found some of the original crank bolts. I also include a photo of the bolt installed.
bolt1.jpg

bolt2.JPG
Having now measured up these bolts I am still a little curious about the design. The threaded holes i n the crankshaft are just over 1 inch deep, but the threaded portion of the bolt is only a half inch long. The diameter of the bolt just above the threaded portion shrinks down to less than a quarter inch. The hole through the gear is at least 20-25 thousands bigger than the diameter of the bolt passing through it. So there is no support against the gear if the bolt is stretch or strained, all of the gear alignment depends on the bolts being tight and being centered by the taper fit between the bolt and gear. Though it has the projecting flange in the back to keep it centered on the shaft.
I don't think it would be prudent to install used bolts in this repair, they have already had 50 plus years of stress and strain. It seems more prudent to install new, high grade bolts, even though that will mean either making them or modifying existing cap screws. Comments and thoughts please?

Last edited by Bob Phillips; 20-12-20 at 03:50.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-12-20, 10:17
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

I have no knowledge here other than being a mechanic. The broken bolts have all failed with a line radiating out from the center which would indicate to me fatigue from the gear being loose and causing failure due to repeated shock loadings, in a rotational direction.
I have seen a Continental engine conrod that had the flats that the conrod bolt head sat against and it was not machined square. This would have led to a conrod bolt failure. There can be many reasons for failure. One of them can be faulty new parts.
I guess I'm about to be educated
Btw. Allen screws / bolts are usually grade 12..... and forged. Machined threads on bolts are usually in the realm of junk bolts.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 20-12-20 at 10:29.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-12-20, 22:55
Don Phillips Don Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 3
Default bolt decoded?

I believe it's this.

Screw, machine, sq-hd, dld-f/1kg-wire, alloy -S, 5/16-24NF-2 (19/32) x 1 7/32 overall lgh

sq-hd = square head
dld-f/lkg-wire = drilled-for locking-wire (note it's an l not a 1)
alloy-S = alloy is steel
5/16-24 NF-2 (19/32) = 5/16 dia 24 TPI Fine, class 2, 19/32 thread length (.594") perhaps?
1 7/32 overall lgh = 1.219"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-12-20, 06:15
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Anybody have any info on the "class 2"?
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-12-20, 11:48
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 561
Default

"Class 2" refers to the fit of the thread - its precise form and tolerances. It should be possible to google it but search "American National Fine thread" not UNF which is based on NF but not precisely the same and was not standardized until post war.

David
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-12-20, 23:32
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

So David, I assume then that there is no indication of tensile strength in the description.
What are your thoughts on what those breaks indicate.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-12-20, 05:18
daninnm's Avatar
daninnm daninnm is offline
Dan Dolan
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 145
Default

This thread is fascinating and super informative!!!! Thanks to all those contributing!!!!! As a C4 operator I’m learning new things about keeping my engine in top form.

1. As an M18 owner I can tell you that in normal automatic shifting operation of the DTD Hydramatic transmission in an R975 C4 engined vehicle is fairly kind to the engine crankshaft. The shifts are smooth going up. Clutch operation in a manual shift set up with a R975 C4 will, as suggested, stress the crankshaft bolts a lot.. BUT, and this is a big one, if you downshift an M18 going to a lower gear from high speed to that lower gear you will get a head-jarring ‘bang’ as the engine rpm is increased by the transmission gear change. There is actually a noticeable ‘bang’ sound when that is done too. I suspect the downshifting may be the source of shock and ultimate failure of the crankshaft bolts in C4 engines in M18s. Normally one would expect an automatic transmission to be ‘kinder’ to the engine crankshaft but my observation as an owner is that the downshift causes a shock just about like the clutch dumping in the manual transmissioned vehicles.

2. I will alert the M18 owners I know that the engine rpm should be kept at 1000 rpm after warmup to prevent main bearing oil starvation and premature wear and engine damage. Almost everyone idles them at 600-800 rpm, not 1,000 rpm.

3. BOB: Was that C4 that you were “sorry got away from you” the core in 2007 or 2008 that I brought from you?

4. Also, anyone see any issue with using AV gas in a lower compression C4 built with the lower compression tank pistons? I know that higher octane gasoline is reputedly for detonation reduction but it seems to have other benefits. We use AV gas exclusively because one, ethanol in MOGas damages fuel pump rubber diaphragms and will cause corrosion from separation in time. Also, we have noticed ‘smoother’ operation in the R975 and super quick starts even when the engine is below 0 C. Also, using AV gas instead of MOGas has the key side benefit that the fuel in the fuel tanks does not ‘rot’ by evaporation and polymerization into the orange garbage old MOGas becomes after sitting 6 months. M18s do sit quite a while between gigs and regular operations though we try to start and run the engine to warm up temps every few months at a minimum to keep the seals in good condition.

5. Further, since it's an AC engine we ignore the M18 Lube Chart for the M18 specifying 30 wgt motor oil (vehicle type) and use AeroShell 100 aircraft engine oil for the higher cylinder head temps found in aircraft engines run in tanks.
daninnm


Last edited by daninnm; 24-12-20 at 05:30. Reason: grammer and additional content
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016