MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Gun Park

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-01-21, 17:21
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,381
Default

I suspect different places, different timber. Pine was not common in Australia before WW2, whereas the local native species were available and abundant. The stocks on .303 rifles made in Australia used, from memory, any of three different native species rather than Walnut.

Aust production was most probably a native hardwood, while in Canada, other species like pine or spruce or maple were probably the most available?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-01-21, 17:30
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
I suspect different places, different timber. Pine was not common in Australia before WW2, whereas the local native species were available and abundant. The stocks on .303 rifles made in Australia used, from memory, any of three different native species rather than Walnut.

Mike
Lithgow-made .303s used a total of 9 species of timber, 1 was NZ Birch, the other 8 were Native Australian species; NO British or indeed any Northern Hemisphere timber species were used at Lithgow.

I wood think that any timber used in Australian-made 25Pdrs or vehicle bodies would also be exclusively native species.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_7010.JPG (102.6 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7011.JPG (112.4 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7012.JPG (135.2 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7013.JPG (133.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7014.JPG (106.0 KB, 1 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-01-21, 17:32
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

More timbers:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_7015.JPG (102.3 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7016.JPG (117.9 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7017.JPG (116.6 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7018.JPG (106.6 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7009.jpg (454.3 KB, 2 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-01-21, 18:13
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,381
Default

Thanks Tony, nine it is.

My reference to Walnut was, of course, to the northern hemisphere species ( Juglans sp.), not Qld walnut (Endiandra palmerstonii).

Like the Canadians, the Australian-manufactured 25-pdr adapted local resources and manufacturing techniques to suit. While most parts were interchangeable, differences did lead to logistics difficulties in the supply of spare parts in some cases. For example, the packings within the Australian buffer & recuperator were different to British production, and not interchangeable.

There are a small number of timber items on or included with a 25-pdr (seat, line mounting block, rammer, oil-can mounting block, parts and tools boxes) but I've not seen specifications which included the type of timber to be used in manufacture.

Mike

Last edited by Mike Cecil; 26-01-21 at 18:19.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-01-21, 22:23
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,914
Default different places, different timber

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
I suspect different places, different timber. Pine was not common in Australia before WW2, whereas the local native species were available and abundant. The stocks on .303 rifles made in Australia used, from memory, any of three different native species rather than Walnut.

Aust production was most probably a native hardwood, while in Canada, other species like pine or spruce or maple were probably the most available?
Indeed local sources were used where possible. See the attached table from the EMER which specifies the "timbers for vehicle bodywork and other uses": the hard woods available in United Kingdom differed from those in Persia & Iraq, for example.

Screenshot_2021-01-26 EMERWood03 webp (WEBP-afbeelding, 583 × 800 pixels) - Geschaald (93%).jpg
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAT seat holders and seat parts replicas Frantisek Nachlinger The Restoration Forum 1 16-07-18 23:50
Wood wheel Lang WW2 Military History & Equipment 0 19-09-17 09:36
Wood, W. M. S. D. & G. Highlanders Kevin_Wood Your Relatives 0 17-02-17 01:52
For Sale: CMP seat base seat covers, NOS kevin powles For Sale Or Wanted 9 21-06-16 00:58
Wood work Jordan Baker The Carrier Forum 1 31-07-06 23:18


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016