MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-02-21, 20:35
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James P View Post
What makes you think it is missing ? Eds 1984 pic or did it get pinched since Steves and the first picture showing the tank ?..............BTW I have a pretty good handle on what gun goes where. Q: is the co-axe supposed to stick out that far on this monument tank ?
Hi James, I am not suggesting it is missing... apply your pretty good handle on what gun goes where and yes, as you deduced, the coaxial mounting 1919A4 .30 cal barrel assembly is not as fully exposed, for this particular turret model.

Unlike the co-driver bow gun.

Part of my poking fun at the need to “re-install” the item.
Could well be a most current inspection may reveal the part has been removed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg D0BCB140-672C-4852-997C-A976226D2955.jpeg (818.7 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpeg 8A4E0C1A-24B7-4980-954C-BF8239779EA9.jpeg (71.4 KB, 1 views)

Last edited by Michael R.; 06-02-21 at 20:50.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-21, 21:54
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is online now
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael R. View Post
Hi James, I am not suggesting it is missing... apply your pretty good handle on what gun goes where and yes, as you deduced, the coaxial mounting 1919A4 .30 cal barrel assembly is not as fully exposed, for this particular turret model.

Unlike the co-driver bow gun.

Part of my poking fun at the need to “re-install” the item.
Could well be a most current inspection may reveal the part has been removed.
Slightly off topic, but relevant to the discussion of Shermans. I see in the top of the left side image "turret cradle lock". Is this a fixture to immobilize the main gun to prevent damage to the gunner's aiming mechanism, the same way other Shermans have a triangular travel lock for the barrel?
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-21, 01:05
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

Michael,
Yes I had spotted that the .30 was protruding too far but opted to add a bit of satire to the subject - oh well, it was worth a try !

Terry,
The interior 'Turret Cradle Lock' does hold the gun at a fixed elevation to relieve the load on the elevation mechanism. There is also a turret traverse lock that engages with the traverse rack on the turret ring to relieve the load on the turret traverse brake on the traverse gearbox. Both these features are operated from inside the turret and so can be easily released if needed.
These features date from the very beginning of Sherman production but it was found quite early on that the external V shaped gun crutch was a much better way to immobilize the gun and turret together during shipping and long advances. There was a way to release the external crutch from inside the tank but it was a bit crude so the original internal locks were retained and gradually made more substantial as Shermans were developed and were intended to be used when there was a possibility of action but a long advance needed to be made.

David
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-21, 01:55
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,166
Default

David:

you got me. I should have known better.


The spring loaded “turret cradle lock” showing above and centred on the main gun. The turret traverse lock handle is usually painted red: part time users with age onset memory loss beware. The hydraulic powered turret traverse is not forgiving.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg D25AC9B5-5400-4089-9864-90B61A987630.jpeg (166.6 KB, 84 views)

Last edited by Michael R.; 07-02-21 at 02:03.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-21, 02:25
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,718
Default M1919a4 mg

Perhaps the M1919A4 MGs were not fitted that often.

M4A2E8 Sherman.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-21, 10:41
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

I would doubt that Shermans would go into action without their .30s as they were very necessary for suppressing attacks from infantry.

I have not seen the shelf before that is fitted in front of the driver's hatch in the photo above. It is certainly not factory. I am thinking that it is too late to be for anti gas paint so possibly the driver's way to avoid water being pushed up the glassis plate and into his hatch when ploughing through deep water.

I suspect that that photo was taken on a training exercise in Canada well post war so no need for MGs.

David
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-21, 15:40
James P James P is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Herbert View Post
I would doubt that Shermans would go into action without their .30s as they were very necessary for suppressing attacks from infantry.

I have not seen the shelf before that is fitted in front of the driver's hatch in the photo above. It is certainly not factory. I am thinking that it is too late to be for anti gas paint so possibly the driver's way to avoid water being pushed up the glassis plate and into his hatch when ploughing through deep water.

I suspect that that photo was taken on a training exercise in Canada well post war so no need for MGs.

David
Weapons on the turret top, C1 SMG and a 1919 that looks fitted with a cone shaped BFA atop a tripod say ex somewhere in Canada.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-21, 20:21
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Herbert View Post
... (paraphrased)
I have not seen the shelf before that is fitted in front of the driver's hatch in the photo above. It is certainly not factory. I am thinking that it is too late to be for anti gas paint so possibly the driver's way to avoid water being pushed up the glassis plate and into his hatch when ploughing through deep water.
David
While not all of the Canadian used M4’s from the former Russian Lend Lease order were subsequently fitted in Canada with the extension plate welded in front of the driver hatch: it is a godsend.

Not only for an extended place to step, but it helps to catch debris that migrates off the track while under way. I am convinced without a supporting (pun) CFTO to verify the intent, the shelf is intended as a step. The absence of one on the co-driver side suggests there was little concern about getting a face full of whatever.

Slips and falls off the M4, as well as any other armour, are not encouraged. There is a core (Corps ?) group who do not need to be reminded.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sherman 105. Gordon Kibble The Armour Forum 6 30-03-18 11:03
Making a sherman mk V out of a sherman M4A4 Gordon Kibble The Armour Forum 3 03-08-16 02:01
19 set in Sherman DanJahn The Wireless Forum 3 08-02-15 01:39
Looking for a Sherman J.P. Brescacin The Armour Forum 5 20-04-04 20:40


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016