MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > 'B' ECHELON > The Sergeants' Mess

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19-03-21, 22:45
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 414
Default

An interesting discussion!

The August 1942, Carbines, Machine, Sten, 9mm, Mks I, II & III, Illustrated Identification List can be found here: https://stephentaylorhistorian.files...t_1942_150.pdf

Info regarding slings can be found on pages 22 and 23. The standard rifle sling was used for Mk I Sten, whereas Mks II and III used “BE 8574, Slings, Carbine, Machine, Sten, 9mm.” The illustration notes that the overall length of this sling is
36” and it appears to be non-adjustable (note, I can’t seem to take a screenshot of the PDF, but I have attached the illustration that I found at a different source).

The 1944, Parts list for Carbine, Machine, Sten, 9mm, Mk V, can be found here:

http://www.karkeeweb.com/patterns/19...n_MkV_1944.pdf

Info regarding the sling can be found on pages 18 and 19. This seemingly longer and adjustable sling is known as “BE 8504, Sling, Carbine, Machine, Sten, 9mm, Mk II”

My interpretation is that there were two Sten slings.

Perry, when you measured the 32” was this the overall length including the metal fittings, or just the webbing? Are these Canadian slings actually shorter than the 36” total length noted in the 1942 British ID List?

For someone with access to an adjustable sling: What is the total extended length?

The second image I have attached of the adjustable sling with stores tag was found at the LWD Parts website: https://www.lwdparts.com/product/ste...nos-war-dated/


Regards,
Colin
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FB8579DF-5ABC-4671-A7B9-2B46C05729F6.jpg (120.1 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpeg 7DCE5A7D-87CC-49B4-A8A3-1CC78CF84D5E.jpeg (103.6 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-03-21, 23:37
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,171
Default

thank you Stefan
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 6BCA555C-AB37-49D1-9DF5-615EA5279D65.jpeg (163.9 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-03-21, 03:02
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,730
Default Sten Slings

You guys were fast on posting the Sten sling information; while digging about I found this reference to the Mk II (113) and Mk III (114) Sten Slings on page 9 in my copy of CW-2 Canadian Ordnance Catalogue - Parts Identification List - Carbine, Machine, Sten, 9mm, Cdn Mk 2-1 - 1953.

Page 9 (2) copy.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-03-21, 03:36
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Storey View Post
You guys were fast on posting the Sten sling information; while digging about I found this reference to the Mk II (113) and Mk III (114) Sten Slings on page 9 in my copy of CW-2 Canadian Ordnance Catalogue - Parts Identification List - Carbine, Machine, Sten, 9mm, Cdn Mk 2-1 - 1953.

Attachment 120946
Rob,

This was from the Parts Identification List for the Sten Cdn Mk 2-1 and it only shows the Mk II and Mk III Sling.

ED
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-03-21, 05:03
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 414
Default

Gents,

It seems that my previous link to the Karkee Web site is not working well.

The 1944 Mk V Sten parts list can be found near the bottom of this page:

http://www.karkeeweb.com/patterns/19...net_frogs.html

There are also images from a British 1951 Mk V Sten parts list. Those images include the nomenclature for the MkII and MK III Slings, which show the VAOS numbers and drawing numbers (the drawing numbers match those listed above by Rob).

My current thoughts are that the slings in question (short and non-adjustable) are the first pattern of Sten sling (VAOS B3 BE 8574). The fact that the surviving examples are a few inches shorter than the 36” described in the British 1942 Parts ID list could have been due to a Canadian production error. There might have been a mistake where the webbing was cut to the “finished length”, and then when it was folded and riveted, it was too short. It seems that this style of sling in unissued condition, was (at least in the past) relatively plentiful on this side of the pond. Maybe it was recognized that they were too short and were purposefully not issued (ideally this would have been caught prior to receiving an acceptance stamp).

I looked through some of the CMHQ files on Sten guns, but they don’t include much correspondence regarding Canadian production (other than quantities and when to expect shipments). There were a number of documents regarding how motorcyclists should carry Stens. The attached document states “The provision of a lengthened sling for the Sten was approved in September 1942 and is now standard”.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg BCC85250-ED21-44D3-9C22-B570E4695F4A.jpeg (252.2 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpeg 2E8A5195-ECF2-40F8-BB80-B726AFAE9A6A.jpeg (210.2 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-03-21, 13:22
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,730
Default Sten Slings

Colin, what Sten sling quantities were quoted in the documents? The question I have is why do these shortened 'slings' lack a manufacturer/date stamp; as was this stamp not added at the end of the production process? I cannot think of many pieces which only have a 'C Broad Arrow' and as it is, these were parts for other major assemblies.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-03-21, 17:12
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 465
Default

Colin,

32" including the fittings. Not adjustable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-03-21, 04:21
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 414
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Storey View Post
Colin, what Sten sling quantities were quoted in the documents? The question I have is why do these shortened 'slings' lack a manufacturer/date stamp; as was this stamp not added at the end of the production process? I cannot think of many pieces which only have a 'C Broad Arrow' and as it is, these were parts for other major assemblies.
Ed,

The quantities I mentioned were monthly quantities of Canadian produced Stens that were being shipped, not sling quantities.

I just captured these images of a couple of slings that had been packed in a box for approx 25 years. A 1942 Z.L.&T non-adjustable, and a 1944 British (hard to read the maker) adjustable.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 8D8837AB-965F-48FD-9730-DF5E0BE9C1FB.jpg (108.8 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg 5EC38875-DBB9-4F40-B13F-49450C5F57A9.jpg (185.1 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 88BCE4A2-1F34-48B3-AD7F-CD624C3486C6.jpg (325.5 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-03-21, 17:21
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin Alford View Post
Gents,

It seems that this style of sling in unissued condition, was (at least in the past) relatively plentiful on this side of the pond. Maybe it was recognized that they were too short and were purposefully not issued (ideally this would have been caught prior to receiving an acceptance stamp).
Most of the ones I have are used and dirty. When I get to the gun room next I'll see if there are any makers marks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-03-21, 03:17
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,608
Default

I just measured one that I had sitting on the desk, and it comes in at 31".
The Cdn manual lists two sten slings. Drawing DD(E)3331 (NSN 1005-21-103-8405)is for the mk2 sten, and drawing DD(E)659/G/4 *NSN 1005-21-103-8404) is for the mk3 sten. The illustrations for both slings show it as being adjustable, however it shows more of a dog clip on both ends of the mk3 sling as compared to the pig tail and loop of the traditional sling. (Ed beat me to posting the photos)



The only sten variation that I can think of that is shorter is the CDN Mk2/1 which is the mk2 fitted with the pistol grip for airborne use, but at the end of the day the sling will start at the part of the butt closest to the endcap, so the working length of the sling really does not change. And if these shorter straps were for that version, I would think they would be listed as such in my 1959 dated manual.



I'll be reaching for my copy of the "Sten Machine Carbine" by Laidler in the next few minutes to see if it sheds any light on these.

Last edited by rob love; 20-03-21 at 17:19.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: C9 Rear Grip, C7 Slings, 82 Pat Holster redhawk_six For Sale Or Wanted 0 07-04-17 05:00
For Sale: WW2 slings,mag loader. Steve Harris For Sale Or Wanted 0 02-03-16 00:09
For Sale: Rifle slings peter simundson For Sale Or Wanted 0 16-08-12 15:24


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016