MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-21, 02:01
Charlie Down Charlie Down is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 140
Default

Thanks Jacques,
I think you are right about it being the wrong type, but interesting all the same. I don't think the 1533X2 had a vacuum supply to power the motors, I presume it was electric, but to be honest I have no idea! The photo shows a cable or tube feed to the motor.
On the operational vehicles it was removed anyway, but I just like to know what should be there, and it might help with what sort of bracket should be on the inside of the windscreen to mount the motor onto. Grant's photo shows a very simple bracket on a later CMP, but looking at the LRDG photo the bracket seems to be more complicated.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Arm3.jpg (149.6 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg arm1.jpg (208.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg arm6.jpg (235.4 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-21, 02:38
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Down View Post
I don't think the 1533X2 had a vacuum supply to power the motors, I presume it was electric, but to be honest I have no idea!
Certainly vacuum. There were a small number of car makers that provided electric wiper motors in the 40's, but usually on high value, low volume models. Certainly not on a Chev (or Ford) Truck, and not for a military model.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-21, 03:35
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Smith View Post
Certainly vacuum. There were a small number of car makers that provided electric wiper motors in the 40's, but usually on high value, low volume models. Certainly not on a Chev (or Ford) Truck, and not for a military model.
This is getting off topic, but didn't at least one Canadian jeep contract have electric wipers? I'll have to check parts lists but hopefully some of our jeep experts will be able to give a quick, definitive answer.
More later on what I believe would be a typical Canadian CMP (Chevrolet) wiper setup.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-08-21, 08:06
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

There are lots of variations in vacuum wipers, up into the later 50s (particularly British cars, often with a vacuum tank (with the hope that you might get at least one wipe as you climbed a hill) These were mostly mounted under the dash so had a separate control.
There were larger units (cylindrical bodies) in the M series trucks that were new (to the N.Z. Army) after the Vietnam war (70s) (e.g.M816- M818)
These were fitted in Wagner logstackers up to 2000. These big units, as I recall were pressure rather than vacuum. (still available?)

I have seen as thread on here talking about Canadian contract Jeeps with electric wipers.

Wipac is a common brand with British units appearing to have a "shield type cover (pointed at the bottom end) and U.S. ones having a cover shaped like a horse racing oval.(e.g. WWII WC Dodge. _ these were small units early on and were larger like the CMP ones later in the war)
The CMP ones like the Dodge ones had an operating lever (assist) as well as a push pull (on off knob) The CMP cover is more square with a rounded bottom.
I have a couple of them still sealed in their Ford V8 marked LV* CC15 17505. I do have a use for them.
I think they were extensively used as Tony said. I hope that helps a bit.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-21, 09:05
Charlie Down Charlie Down is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 140
Default

Thanks for the info, learning every day!
So what generated the vacuum? Not come across anything on the various drawing and photo's that indicates a vacuum generator on the truck, so was a vacuum generated as a by-product of the engine to power the motor?
Tony, I hope it's a simple bracket, I'm not looking for complicated, I like simple. But more importantly I love accuracy and details! In the period photo with the arrow you can see what looks like a lip on the bracket. This could just be something in the background 'photo-bombing' the image. Looking at other components they are as simple as possible, so it's most likely a simple flat bar with 3 holes, just seeking confirmation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-21, 12:15
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Vacuum is drawn from a threaded port in the Intake Manifold.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-08-21, 12:36
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
There are lots of variations in vacuum wipers, up into the later 50s (particularly British cars, often with a vacuum tank (with the hope that you might get at least one wipe as you climbed a hill) These were mostly mounted under the dash so had a separate control.
There were larger units (cylindrical bodies) in the M series trucks that were new (to the N.Z. Army) after the Vietnam war (70s) (e.g.M816- M818)
These were fitted in Wagner logstackers up to 2000. These big units, as I recall were pressure rather than vacuum. (still available?)
When younger, I owned a M135CDN 2-1/2 ton truck. Being gasoline powered, the truck would have been capable of generating vacuum to run wipers but the truck definitely used compressed air to run the wipers, taken from the system that provided air pressure for brake boost, trailer braking and also had an outlet under the dash for a hose to inflate tires. I presume other trucks of the same vintage may have used similar components. One advantage of using air pressure is that if there is a small leak, there's no chance of drawing water into the engine (recall that they made a big thing of the early M series being sealed to run under water).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-08-21, 17:29
Charlie Down Charlie Down is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 140
Default

At the moment it looks like a simple mounting bracket, although reading around it could have 4 mounting holes on early brackets and 2 on later ones. Phil Waterman photo illustrates this nicely
I'm also beginning to understand the variety of motors available for the MCP/CMP range with this Lynn Eades photo showing just a few of them.
So far though not matched any motor to last photo, which appears to have a block on the rear of the assembly at about 45 degrees. Or is that just an optical illusion?
Is it safe to assume they would be Trico motors?


http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/sh...t=wiper+motors
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wiper3.jpg (99.9 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg Wiper 2.jpg (74.9 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg Wiper motors.jpg (45.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg wiper4.jpg (109.5 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-08-21, 23:04
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Charlie, here is my opinion on your center photo.
Top two are CMP. and later U.S Mil. production.
Third down is U.S. manufacture. (eg. 42 Dodge 3/4 ton)
Bottom one is British.

This is just my opinion from what I have experienced. I could well be wrong.

I believe the big cylindrical ones can be converted from pressure to vacuum or vicky verco.
Also my comment about the hill was because when the throttle is closed you get the max . manifold vacuum and when the throttle is down (open) you have very little manifold vacuum, which results in the wipers slowing or stopping.

I have never seen the top one in your first photo, before now.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 05-08-21 at 23:45.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-08-21, 15:40
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

The picture of the 4 wiper motors, the top one is the CMP/MCP type. This is a Trico unit known as the S Series. There are a variety of models within this series with different spindle lengths and mounting dimensions, but the operation of the mechanism is the same.

My understanding is that Cab 11/12 CMPs did not have the spacer bracket on the Windshield frame and used a short-spindle S 570 wiper. Cab 13 trucks which had the stand-off bracket mounted to the windshield frame (and therefore possibly the 1533 MCP) used either the S 609 or the S 548 with a longer spindle. Each of these came in a LH and RH version
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_7497-1.jpg (228.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg S 570 (1).jpg (200.4 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg S 570 (2).jpg (223.7 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg S 570 (3).jpg (185.6 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg S 609 (3).jpg (199.8 KB, 2 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-08-21, 02:42
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Down View Post
Grant's photo shows a very simple bracket on a later CMP, but looking at the LRDG photo the bracket seems to be more complicated.
I think they both look the same, as simple as it needs to be. What complexity do you see?
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: plunger assemblies Rick DeBruyn For Sale Or Wanted 4 09-09-24 09:38
Chevy 216 Throwout bearing Jordan Baker Parts/Sources/Prices 3 22-04-18 08:01
For Sale: Carrier Vision Shutter Assemblies SDeMocko For Sale Or Wanted 2 09-01-17 05:06
For Sale: mirror arm assemblies LP2/2A Darrin Wright For Sale Or Wanted 1 28-10-14 23:01
Headgear Assemblies No. 1 Canadian David Dunlop The Wireless Forum 1 18-07-13 19:23


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016