MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-11-22, 00:08
Mike K's Avatar
Mike K Mike K is offline
Fan of Lord Nuffield
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 5,868
Default Lend-Lease

Quote:
Originally Posted by daninnm View Post
Well, to answer the question - yes, this is the Stag that came from the Melbourne Museum sale 15 years ago....Gathered parts and bought out a large collection of NOS stuff (thousands of pounds) also from Australia. The Aussies thought I was nuts for buying it and truly it took two years to get paperwork done to get it into the US!

Have a nice Thanksgiving.
Dan
Hi Dan

I don't know how you managed to import ex-Lend-Lease stuff back into the USA from Australia, unless the two governments have recently amended the original wartime Lend-Lease agreement.

There was a local in my area who had a large stock of NOS Lend-Lease Stuart M3 light tank parts including NOS radial engines ( which I saw). The story goes: because of the Lend-Lease agreement , he was not permitted to sell any of it back to the USA . What was left of the stockpile was sold as a big lot locally but the deal went bad and it ended up in the courts with lawyers involved
__________________
1940 cab 11 C8
1940 Morris-Commercial PU
1941 Morris-Commercial CS8
1940 Chev. 15cwt GS Van ( Aust.)
1942-45 Jeep salad
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-11-22, 01:49
daninnm's Avatar
daninnm daninnm is offline
Dan Dolan
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 145
Default

call me fyv-05 tew-69 205-syx
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-11-22, 11:23
Jakko Westerbeke Jakko Westerbeke is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Kelly View Post
because of the Lend-Lease agreement , he was not permitted to sell any of it back to the USA . What was left of the stockpile was sold as a big lot locally but the deal went bad and it ended up in the courts with lawyers involved
That sounds to me like he could have done that a bit smarter … like, sell via an in-between person in a third country?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-11-22, 19:56
daninnm's Avatar
daninnm daninnm is offline
Dan Dolan
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 145
Default sending old military stuff from Australia to the States

My understanding of the world in that regard is as follows:
Australia requires an export permit for military vehicles so they can grab it for their military museum...if they have one in the museum you get the permit.
The US State Dept. now permits importation of former LEND-LEASE US Vehicles older than 1959. Still need a BATF Form 6 showing 'no guns' but the armor part is OK....
Parts importation as never been an issue and is permittred to return as US GOODS RETURNING - used and antique car and truck parts. hat rule from State changed maybe a decade ago. As long as not intended for regular on-rad use - no import duty - because it is not foreign truck.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-11-22, 21:02
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

"Australia requires an export permit for military vehicles so they can grab it for their military museum...if they have one in the museum you get the permit."

Sort of, Dan, but to clarify for readers:

The MCH Act requires that there be two items of similar quality to the item for which an export permit is requested, in public collections in Australia before a permanent export permit can be considered. This has been interpreted by MCH to mean that the two examples be held in separate public collections, not both in the same place.

The MCH process does not require an item refused export to be held by or obtained by a public collection, simply that it cannot be exported. It can still be retained or sold by a private individual or non-government collection.

Technically, parts also fall within the meaning of the MCH Act but I've not seen any evidence of parts being applied for, or any blocking of permanent export of parts under the auspices of the MCH Act.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-11-22, 21:10
daninnm's Avatar
daninnm daninnm is offline
Dan Dolan
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 145
Default

Good comment - I just knew there was a 'duplicate' requirement....for export.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-22, 21:38
daninnm's Avatar
daninnm daninnm is offline
Dan Dolan
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 145
Default Arrived!!!!

Staghound 2023 has arrived in Antwerp yesterday. Clearing customs and hopefully driving around in the Netherlands on FRIDAY??!!


ARC DEFENDER

ANTWERP STEENBANK
ETA: Nov 30, 01:00
Predicted ETA -
Distance / Time -
Course / Speed 72° / 0.0 kn
Current draught 9.6 m
Navigation Status Moored
Position received 1 min ago
IMO / MMSI 9375264 / 338145000
Callsign WDM6793
Flag USA
Length / Beam 200 / 32 m
Antwerpen, Belgium
ATA: Nov 30, 06:20 UTC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
43rd Corowa Swim-In and Military Vehicle Gathering 13-19th March 2023 Jan Thompson Military Shows & Events 4 01-11-22 23:44
The Battle of Antwerp - City of Sudden Death Hanno Spoelstra WW2 Military History & Equipment 5 19-02-22 10:03
Staghound ID. Dennis Cardy The Armour Forum 1 06-08-19 05:46
Staghound III who had them? Sean Dunnage The Sergeants' Mess 10 03-09-07 19:49
Dodge trucks S/M 2023 David_Hayward (RIP) The Softskin Forum 5 25-08-05 16:49


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016